Talk:Moms for Liberty

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Anachronist in topic Nothing here about the Florida sex scandal?

Semi-protected edit request on 8 June 2023 edit

Moms for Liberty has been identified as an extremist hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which is a legal advocacy group dedicated to identifying extremism and hate in the United States. 2604:3D08:948C:3A00:B181:D8D4:D0FB:4F0F (talk) 09:26, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

That's already in the lead of the article. What change did you want made? Grachester (talk) 09:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Actualcpscm (talk) 10:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Antisemitism edit

Should anything be included about the group's alleged antisemitism as well? https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/29/us/politics/moms-for-liberty-republicans.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.205.128.138 (talk) 17:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

2023 election results edit

This group was defeated in many races last night, for local school boards. Hopefully someone posts the data here. 137.188.108.39 (talk) 14:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality edit

This article mentions that a MFL chapter quoted Hitler, but ignores context. They quoted Hitler in a newsletter because they were comparing their enemies to him. MFL believe our public schools are indoctrinating their children with pathological beliefs, so they quoted Hitler to show that this is what tyrannical regimes do.

Whether you agree with their logic or not, they arent quoting the man in a positive light. Here's a source: https://www.wfyi.org/news/articles/indiana-chapter-of-moms-for-liberty-features-hitler-quote-in-first-newsletter 65.129.80.76 (talk) 01:03, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nothing here about the Florida sex scandal? edit

This has been all over the news lately, with Moms for Liberty being accused of hypocrisy for a cofounder engaging in three-way sex with her husband and another woman.

...and plenty of other reliable sources. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

See under 'Reception' (para. 5). -- Jmc (talk) 08:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
A consensual threesome between full-grown adults? How is this a scandal? Dimadick (talk) 10:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
I think the scandal arises from the hypocrisy perceived in the contrast between the moral high ground assumed by the organization regarding LBTQ+ relationships and the actual practice of the founder. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Jmc: Ah, I see, that's why I missed it. "Reception" is the wrong section for that. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Anachronist I agree. Feel free to shift it - or start a new section. -- Jmc (talk) 08:03, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Done. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:44, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply