Talk:Miss Pooja
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 28 May 2008. The result of the discussion was delete. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 11 January 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reason not to speedy edit
I have been working with the original creator on this article so COI prevents me from declining the speedy myself. I don't believe this qualifies for G4 as it is not substantially identical to the version deleted at AFD (I should know I've deleted a few versions in the interim!). If someone really thinks it should be deleted then I would suggest that a new AFD is now in order. Cheers, Nancy talk 18:28, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Please cross-check edit
I request administrators not to blindly delete this article, as this article is requested by many users, and all fans of Miss Pooja really want to see her here. This was deleted previously as, at that time references were mostly from blogs and forums. Now the article is in prefect order. Does not make sense now to delete this article. Quality check 19:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Revisions restored edit
Per discussion with the admin that deleted the last "proper" version of the article, those revisions have been restored as it is no longer substantially identical to the article deleted at AFD. Nancy talk 19:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Edit request on 3 January 2012 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Dil Mera Gaya Lutiya 2.121.223.109 (talk) 14:09, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Birth date edit
Which site is to be trusted?
- http://themisspooja.com/about says 1980
- http://www.misspooja.org/ says 1979
— Wbm1058 (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- The first page is down now.. The second one contains a list of 192 porn page links.... 2001:4091:A247:8008:F80C:FCA2:6BA8:1B87 (talk) 23:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)