Talk:Matuzalém

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Club dispute edit

Matuzalem is still under contract to Shakhtar Donetsk [1], therefore he can not sign with any other club, and untill legal dispue is over Matuzalem remains under contract to Shakhtar, Please do not engage in a edit war.--MaksKhomenko 13:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have to agree with MaksKhomenko on this, however, the fact that Zaragoza did sign Matuzalem (albeit illegally) should be mentioned in the profile, with a suggestion of likely UEFA arbitration on the illegal signing. --Palffy 00:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
...err, FIFA (see Palkin's speech in Russian here). --Palffy 00:30, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
I have added some information about Matuzalem's escape and Zaragoza signing.--MaksKhomenko 12:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Name edit

Francelino is a given name, so Matuzalem da Silva should be his common name and in correct spelling, have lots of source to Matuzalem da Silva in Italian media. Matthew_hk tc 00:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was not moved.Juliancolton | Talk 02:32, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


MatuzalémMatuzalem — No source his name have é instead of e, and there is no standardized spelling on registration office(Ântonio Antonio both allowed). Matthew_hk tc 20:02, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) covers this issue. Since Portugese is a Romance language, proper names are generally not transliterated into English, although diacritics may be dropped in some instances due to technical restrictions. Since Wikipedia uses Unicode, there is no technical restriction on the use of diacritics. Barring any obvious reliable, verifiable sources to establish WP:COMMONNAME I do not see a compelling reason for this move to occur.
    V = I * R (talk) 05:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment - I was under the impression that this fellow's name was "Matuzalém", and there are sources available to corroborate this. The fact that there are few English-language sources that use this spelling should be irrelevant when you consider that the difference is just one diacritic. – PeeJay 08:41, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • I agree with Ohms law. This is case of Wikipedia:Use_English#No_established_usage. No separate English usage has emerged for writing Matuzalém's name specifically, so we should go with the native spelling. --Atemperman (talk) 19:20, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Parma edit

I found a mystery deal by Parma-Napoli in June 2001, which Napoli bought Matuzalém another half for 14 billion lire and made Parma had a co-ownership income of 9 billion (on Napoli side, the co-ownership cost of same amount documented on 9 billion), however, co-currently Parma bought half of the registration rights of a mystery player for 14 billion lire (in order to make the deal a pure player swap), which documented in 2000–01 accounts of Napoli but not shown in Parma one. The mystery deal seems resolved in July 2001 as Matuzalém returned to Parma in full and re-sold to Piacenza, with the co-ownership deal of the mystery player was resolved before the annual meeting in June 2002. As in Napoli accounts did not shown a huge co-ownership income nor co-ownership as worse as any breakdown, the resolve price nor he was signed (re-signed) by Parma or Napoli was not known. It was informative as false accounting but i can't find any other source, and it somewhat related to Matuzalém, i did not add the content to the article yet. Matthew_hk tc 13:57, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Matuzalém. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Matuzalém. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply