Talk:MCS (fashion brand)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved to MCS (fashion brand): per discussion Ground Zero | t 01:47, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

---

Marlboro Classics → MCS – change name brand Buoneazioni (talk) 07:07, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

• Strong oppose MCS is a disambiguation page, and this clearly shouldn't be replacing a disambiguation page, as it does not indicate other articles that use the name "MCS" Further, this isn't even the primary topic. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 04:36, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Update The suggested MCS (fashion brand) is acceptable to me. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 05:22, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose move to MCS, but support either MCS (clothing) or MCS (brand) - both forms of disambiguation are used in Category:Clothing brands, and nothing else on the disambiguation page appears to be related to clothing or brands. Peter James (talk) 11:58, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
• @Peter James:@Buoneazioni: How about MSC (fashion brand)? Gregkaye (talk) 21:11, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
  • That would be equally acceptable (already used on three pages in the category). Peter James (talk) 22:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
  • I take it you mean MCS (fashion brand) (not "MSC") ; that's acceptable to me. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 05:22, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
    • Yes, MCS (fashion brand) is perfect. Is it possible to move? Peter James — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buoneazioni (talk • contribs) 13:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
• Support Please keep the former name in the article, though (I reinstated it). —innotata 21:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
  • @Innotata: thanks, when the requested move will be accepted? Thanks again

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Revenue

The revenue that is currently listed – €0.17 billion billion (or €170,000,000,000,000,000 / €170,000 tn) – is somewhere in the region of double the GDP of the entire world. I'm guessing that it probably means €170m but the first nine months of 2007 saw it pull in €250m, which makes me question this figure. Anyone got a better source for this figure? 90.152.4.84 (talk) 14:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)