Talk:Lo Hsien-che
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Error of logic
editIt is stated that he was the "highest-ranking officer arrested for allegedly spying for the PRC, and thus represents Taiwan's worst espionage case in 50 years". This is incorrect. He may be the most senior, but probably not the worst. Seniority does not equal damage. A communications officer with limited access to military secrets would do less harm than a junior filing clerk in sensitive military unit.203.184.41.226 (talk) 06:10, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lo Hsien-che. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140907004458/http://www.cna.com.tw/ShowNews/Detail.aspx?pNewsID=201102100270&pType0=aALL&pTypeSel=0 to http://www.cna.com.tw/ShowNews/Detail.aspx?pNewsID=201102100270&pType0=aALL&pTypeSel=0
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628195410/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=10&art_id=107953&sid=31254314&con_type=1&d_str=20110211&sear_year=2011 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=10&art_id=107953&sid=31254314&con_type=1&d_str=20110211&sear_year=2011
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)