Keep it up.

edit

Why do we need to get rid of the page, why can't we just let it stay up? There's a bunch of other pre-release pages for albums, so whyy do we have a problem with this one? Sorbet Kid (talk) 16:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I agree. [redacted] It's anticipated so let it stay Dinah5667 (talk) 22:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Dinah5667: Please remember this is not a forum and personal attacks, such as the one above, are not allowed. I will proceed to remove part of it. Bedivere (talk) 23:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Tour dates

edit

The following table was removed from the article by User:Knowledgekid87 based on the assertion that it was "not needed". While I am not convinced that there is such a test for inclusion of content in Wikipedia, I would note that readers process information in various ways, and some will find a table to be a more useful organization of information. I propose that the table be restored to the article. Please note that I have added the newly announced London date in July. BD2412 T 19:08, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I just don't see how a handful of vague dates and locations is helpful here. I did find WP:NOTADVERT, which states "Wikipedia articles about a person, company, or organization are not an extension of their website, press releases, or other social media marketing efforts. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify notable organizations which are the topic of the article." I think readers can just as easily access the information via the external links provided. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Knowledgekid87: If WP:NOTADVERT prohibited what you describe as "a handful of vague dates and locations", then I'm sure Wikipedia would not have literally thousands of articles containing exactly such tables. We would not have, just for this year for example, exactly the same kind of presentation at:
Should all of those be deleted? BD2412 T 19:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Koavf and 03md: As you have added comparable tables of tour dates to Continue as a Guest and What's Rock and Roll?, respectively, your perspective on the permissibility of including such a table may be useful here. Cheers! BD2412 T 00:57, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
These shouldn't be deleted, as they are relevant, sourced (assuming they are sourced) information about how an album is promoted or what happens on a tour. It's extra puzzling to think that we're going to have an article about a tour and not mention where and when the artist was on the tour. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 00:59, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@BD2412: I knew this would go into whataboutism, but my opinion stands. It would apply as "Wikipedia articles about a person, company, or organization are not an extension of their website, press releases, or other social media marketing efforts." You haven't stated how this wouldn't apply? The sources used are press releases announcing tour dates, it is a marketing effort to get people to go to the artist's shows. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:55, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Tour dates aren't extensions of websites, press releases, or other social media marketing efforts. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 20:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Which source in this article do you think is a "press release"? Sources with editorial policies appear to have seen fit to publish all of this. Also, you are confusing internal consistency across the encyclopedia for whataboutism. WP:Some stuff exists for a reason. BD2412 T 21:23, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I want to add that I feel this would only apply to artists who have upcoming tours. I have no issue with past tour information as that is covered by WP:RS in retrospect. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
In this case, 75% of the tour dates are "past tour information as that is covered by WP:RS in retrospect". So what do we do, just cover the past dates and pretend the planned future dates have not also been reported in RS? Not cover any of the dates until all have been completed, despite the existence of reviews and the like? You said on my talk page that "the information is already covered in prose"—why, then, is it permissible to include a textual description of the information, but not the standard table? BD2412 T 21:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
If there is nothing new to say in this discussion, I will restore the table forthwith in 24 hours. BD2412 T 18:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Date City Country Venue
February 4 Dublin Ireland Green Room – The Academy
February 6 Glasgow Scotland Warehouse SWG3
February 7 Manchester UK Gorilla
February 8 Birmingham O2 Academy
February 10 London Heaven
February 11 Bristol Thekla
May 4 Cambridge, MA US The Sinclair
May 5 Philadelphia, PA The Foundry
May 6 Brooklyn, NY The Hall, Elsewhere
May 9 Montreal, QC Canada Théâtre Fairmount
May 10 Toronto, ON Axis Club
May 12 Chicago, IL US Bottom Lounge
May 14 Saint Paul, MN Amsterdam Bar & Hall
May 16 Denver, CO Marquis Theater
May 17 Salt Lake City, UT Soundwell
May 19 San Francisco, CA The Independent
May 20 Los Angeles, CA El Rey Theatre
June 23 Brooklyn, NY Ladyland Festival[1]
July 2 London UK Hyde Park[2]
July 20 Vancouver Canada Sound Club
July 21 Seattle, WA US Capitol Hill Block Party
July 22 Portland, OR Hawthorne Theatre

References

  1. ^ Supporting Honey Dijon and Peaches.
  2. ^ Supporting Blackpink, along with Sabrina Carpenter, The Rose, Caity Baser, and others.

Request for Comment on whether an article on an album may contain a table of dates for the tour supporting the album

edit

There has been a long-running slow-motion dispute on this page regarding the list of tour dates for the supporting album tour that ran from February 4 to July 22, 2023.

The project page, WP:CONCERT TOUR, says that for an article on a concert tour, "Tables may be used to present tour date information, such as dates, venues, locations, and opening/support acts". However, the essay, WP:ALBUMSTYLE, says, "Concert tours are not always notable enough to warrant stand-alone articles (see WP:NMG#Concert tours). Instead, information about notable tours and festivals should be incorporated into either the artist's page, or the album article for which the tour is supporting. Do not list all dates here, instead mention the range of dates (ex. June–September 1992)".

Neither of these pages are policy, but they leave gray the question of how to treat a concert tour that is arguably notable enough to have a separate article, but can arguably more concisely be presented to the reader as a section of an article on the album being promoted through this tour. BD2412 T 15:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • I am inclined to agree that a full table of dates is overkill. We are not making a WP:DIRECTORY, and I would personally prefer to see something like “Between February 4 and August 25, Black toured the US, Canada, UK and Ireland... ” But ultimately the table doesn’t hurt anything, and this is just a question of editorial discretion. — HTGS (talk) 02:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC) (Summoned by bot)Reply
    I should also make explicit: this is an article about the album; if the subject were the tour, a table or list of dates might be quite sensible. — HTGS (talk) 02:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Start and end dates only. For an article about the album, noting each date, location, etc., is excess detail, since the tour is not even the primary article subject. It's fine to note that the tour was associated with the album, but that should be done relatively briefly. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply