Talk:Leicester Square

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleLeicester Square has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starLeicester Square is part of the List of London Monopoly locations series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 4, 2016Good article nomineeListed
May 17, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article


Counterintuitive? edit

counterintuitive, a quirk of British English...

Counterintuitive? Quirk? Excuse us. According to whom? Tourists from the Americas? The pronunciation is eminently consistent and logical.

Leicester Square, a construction site edit

Leicester Square is undergoing a major redesign that has been planned for the upcoming Olympic Games. As of today, the Square is nothing more than a building yard, and a tall fence (which has "Getting ready for 2012" written on it) forbids public access. According to the sign there, the Square will be under construction until March 30th 2012. I think this info has to be put somewhere in the article. --188.39.25.248 (talk) 22:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

of possible interest edit

Apparently there was a plan to build an opera house there at one point:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/leicester-square-london-with-the-design-for-a-proposed-new50836

©Geni 04:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Interesting to see the statue of George I. Lozleader (talk) 10:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Here we are: "A Royal Opera House in Leicester Square (1790)". Cambridge Opera Journal. 2 (1). Cambridge University Press: 1–28. March 1990. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) I don't have access to JSTOR any more :-( but the first page is visible to all. Lozleader (talk) 10:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Frederick died nine years before his death? edit

The article say: "Leicester House was briefly the residence of Frederick, Prince of Wales from 1742 until his death the following year." But Frederick did not die "the following year" (1743), he died in 1751?--Aciram (talk) 13:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Aciram: Got it. The source (Survey of London, vol. 33-34, pages 441-472) says "Some time before June of that year he [sixth Earl of Leicester] agreed to let the house to George II's eldest son, Frederick, Prince of Wales, (fn. 86) but he died in July 1743", so he must refer to Jocelyn Sidney, 7th Earl of Leicester, not the prince. Should be fixed now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leicester Square. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply