Talk:Larry Hogan

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Pemilligan in topic Orphaned references in Larry Hogan

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:07, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Larry Hogan

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Larry Hogan's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Unofficial":

  • From 2018 United States gubernatorial elections: "Unofficial 2018 Gubernatorial Primary Election results for Governor / Lt. Governor". Maryland State Board of Elections. Annapolis, Maryland: State Board of Elections. July 10, 2018. Archived from the original on July 11, 2018. Retrieved July 11, 2018.
  • From 2018 Maryland gubernatorial election: "Unofficial 2018 Gubernatorial Primary Election results for Governor / Lt. Governor". Maryland State Board of Elections. Annapolis, Maryland: State Board of Elections. July 10, 2018. Retrieved July 11, 2018.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 05:06, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Done --Pemilligan (talk) 20:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Political positions": section doesn't seem promotional

edit

The "Political positions" section was flagged as promotional, as above. After reading the article (with little knowledge about its subject) I have removed the tag: the content is all of the type "he did this, he did that, he took that position", without praise or condemnation, and with sources. If anything is incorrect it obviously needs correcting; if relevant things have been omitted they need adding. But I don't see any more signs of bias or selection that in comparable articles. Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply