This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Significant portions of the article speak directly to concerns intimate or of merit only to the personality subject of the article- what Kim-Joy was considering to study, the name of her cats, partner, etc. The tone, focus, and scale of elements should be edited for encyclopedic character. Mavigogun (talk) 15:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletionedit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Not sure why sections were removed and card game was added to a renamed 'bibliography' section. It's not a book, and it's not by her. Valereee (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oh... My mistake. I realize that when I just now read the article. George Ho (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
apparently she avoided using her father's surname, and I'm not sure we can argue she was notable under it. I kind of feel like we don't need it in the lead? Valereee (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Why should she be considered "joint second" rather than "runner-up"? I'm uncertain whether she should be considered "joint second". She's always a runner-up as said in the season page. All others considered "joint second" are also "runners-up". George Ho (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I can't help wonder whether the article currently has too many details that would interest niche, i.e. specific, audience. I don't know how and why critics' opinions improve readers' understanding of this person. Maybe readers are unable to taste her bakes or something? George Ho (talk) 06:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Critic's opinions of her work are important to readers' understanding of how her work was received. Valereee (talk) 21:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
