Talk:Kiki's Delivery Service

Latest comment: 2 years ago by AndyFielding in topic "Themes and Analysis"? Really?
Former good articleKiki's Delivery Service was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 25, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
March 22, 2008Good article nomineeListed
April 7, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 26, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Delisted good article

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kiki's Delivery Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kiki's Delivery Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:46, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Typo in Release Section edit

At the very beginning of the Release section the character Satsuki from Totoro is misspelled as Satuski. Since the entry is protected I can't edit it but it should be fixed by someone if possible. JarodColdbreak (talk) 04:26, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. Thanks for spotting it! Popcornduff (talk) 06:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Use of non-free Images (again) edit

This issue has been previously discussed a while back. The article contains about four non-free images: The Film's poster, two screencaps from the film, and an image from the book "Majo no Takkyūbin". This seems very unusual for a Ghibli-related article, considering that none of the other Ghibli films have non-free screencaps of the films. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 03:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reviewing the images, they appear to be supported by reliably-sourced contextual significance. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 03:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Erik: Thank you so much. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 17:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Themes and Analysis"? Really? edit

Is it just me, or does the entire "Themes and Analysis" section seem pretty highfalutin for an animated feature? What's next—psychoanalyzing Spongebob Squarepants? – AndyFielding (talk) 12:07, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply