Talk:Kevin Belcher (baseball)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Jenks24 in topic Requested move 26 November 2015
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kevin Belcher (baseball) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 26 November 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 13:10, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
– There's no way someone who played in 16 MLB baseball games is a primary topic. -- Tavix (talk) 21:46, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support For "Kevin Belcher", it appears there is no primary topic. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support. I disagree that "there's no way" in all cases (it could be baseball player versus two YouTube figures), but when the other options are other professional sportsmen with more experience, there's no way in this specific situation. Nyttend (talk) 23:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- I was referring to this specific case, but I see how it can be read that way. You are correct that my nom statement wouldn't be applicable everywhere. -- Tavix (talk) 00:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.