Talk:Janina San Miguel

Question

Hi! Can anybody please describe why knowing English is required from Miss Philipines?--79.111.101.222 (talk) 08:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Janina San Miguel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080907190625/http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/entertainment/entertainment/view/20080317-125298/Paolo-Bediones-defends-Miss-RP-World-winner to http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/entertainment/entertainment/view/20080317-125298/Paolo-Bediones-defends-Miss-RP-World-winner
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081002223953/http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/entertainment/entertainment/view/20080930-163845/Controversial-beauty-titlist-quits to http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/entertainment/entertainment/view/20080930-163845/Controversial-beauty-titlist-quits
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150626111104/http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/World_2008.htm to http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/World_2008.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924033017/http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/220971/janina-san-miguel-eyes-modeling-tilt-after-celebrity-duets to http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/220971/janina-san-miguel-eyes-modeling-tilt-after-celebrity-duets

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Janina San Miguel

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Article needs an update, with very little post-2009 information. Uncited text throughout, and unnecessary quoting from the Q&A portion of a pageant. Lede might also need an expansion. Z1720 (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Updated the article. Can you please be more specific which texts are unsourced? I can try finding sources. D-Flo27 (talk) 12:09, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

@D-Flo27, I'm not Z1720 but I have added some "Citation needed" templates to places that need citations. Hopefully it will help. Cheers! Spinixster (chat!) 14:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for adding citations. I would like to add that there are a few other problems:

• Reference 11 is just a YouTube search page. I'd recommend removing the information that is being cited unless there's another reliable source to back the claim up (if you need help, WP:RSP is your friend.
• Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants/Sources, Pageantopolis is not reliable.
• What makes GetzMo (reference 4) reliable? The page seems to be dead.

Below are not really recommendations in order to maintain its GA status, but is still worth fixing.

• The citation style is inconsistent (some websites are wikilinked, some are not, some include authors, some do not), and per WP:CITEVAR, I'd suggest making it consistent.
• I would recommend expanding the lead so it would summarize the entire article. Right now, it's quite short and does not summarize the article well. WP:LEAD might help.
• Reference 23 is dead; I'd recommend finding an archived or live version.

Spinixster (chat!) 06:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I've made some edits based on your suggestions. However, I'm not sure how I can expand the lead without mentioning her mistakes during the Q&A portion, which has been done on previous versions of this article and was even called out in this article from a popular lifestyle magazine. So, if you have any suggestions on that, let me know. D-Flo27 (talk) 02:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Oh, do you mean what Z1720 has said? I think they meant the quoting in the Question and answer section was what's unnecessary. I would recommend removing the quote and stating that she had answered the question poorly instead. I don't think a quote is needed to show her mistakes. The Q&A portion can still be mentioned in the lead, since it's a prominent part of the section. Spinixster (chat!) 07:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Did you see the above D-Flo27? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, unfortunately I've been busy the past week and this week that I haven't been able to add the edits. If someone else can do add those edits for me, that would be nice. D-Flo27 (talk) 04:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.