Talk:Jamie Marchi
Latest comment: 1 month ago by 2602:41:8022:D200:7187:B9BA:D2C3:7C55 in topic Vandalism; re:Vic Mignogna sexual harrassment controversy
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vandalism; re:Vic Mignogna sexual harrassment controversy edit
This page was getting vandalized due to Marchi's allegations of sexual harassment against Vic Mignogna. The Monica Rial, Pensacon and Vic Mignogna pages were made semi-protected after being vandalized for the same reasons, and often are un-sourced edits with heavy bias against people who have spoken against Mr. Mignogna; I think this page should be made semi-protected as well. --PatManDX (talk) 03:52, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- Jamie Marchi is currently sued by Vic Mignogna due to her internet allegations. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 12:59, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have removed the statement about the difficulty of the service processor in contacting Marchi in order to server her the legal notice of the lawsuit. It doesn't explain any significance to the lawsuit and it was not backed up by a reliable third-party source. I also tagged Marchi's sexual harassment claims as requiring a third-party source, preferably not ANN because they are an involved party. This is one issue were we (Wikipedia) should not be citing first-party sources to verify the content. —Farix (t | c) 00:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Unsourced yet when it is given sourced you change the goal posts. Acting like the CCP or the kremlin when making a law. Keeping it as vague as possible to allow your own bias over rule. For one there is a lot more to the story and the same citations and sources are perfectly acceptable in other pages yet depending on the subject the rules are applied differently. Justify it all you want but it is clearly visible. It is one thing to stop the crazy hate and personal attacks it is another to removed sourced quotes that are controversial. Sure, should not be the lead or front and center but censoring controversies entirely is obviously what is happening. Weather you agree with one side or another that only hurts wikipedia site overall. Things like this only gives more ammo to countries that block and ban wikipedia. This is a huge disservice to freedom of information let alone to the community at general that uses wikipedia. You really should try to limit such bias in the moderation of the edits. Protecting truth is one thing and censoring controversies is quite another. 2602:41:8022:D200:7187:B9BA:D2C3:7C55 (talk) 12:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Grammer edit
I see one grammer error when talking about her role in that one episode of Family Guy so if anyone could be good and fix up that error that would be great ok Kirbopher2004 (talk) 03:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)