Talk:James Booker

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good article nomineeJames Booker was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 8, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed


Archive Talk Page #1, 7-9-2007

Untitled edit

While much good work has gone into this article, I'm not sure I like how reference to his drug use and problem has almost been completely removed from the article. I think in Booker's case his drug situation was not just a bit of personal trivia, but at least in his later years a central part of his life and career which needs to be discussed for any understanding of Booker. I think his career would have gone much further had he been able to reliably perform like his better days. Some of the live recordings show how he could play some amazing stuff while pretty wasted, but remember he also had days when he was so off his goard he couldn't play shit, and places like the Maple Leaf that hired him regularly knew they had to put up with that sort of thing, which other venues would not. -- Infrogmation 15:57, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copyvios from allaboutjazz edit

Last July, user:Adidonna heavily revised this article ([this is a before and after diff), copying sentences and entire paragraphs verbatim from http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/musician.php?id=5177. This site is copyrighted with all rights reserved, meaning its text cannot be included here. With this edit, I've deleted the copied material but have tried to preserve additions made since then. allaboutjazz.com certainly can be (and is) used as a reference, but not as a source for large chunks of text. -- Rick Block (talk) 19:29, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

All Alone with the Blues edit

Interesting stuff about the film "All Alone with the Blues." All I can find is catalog listings for it - would be nice to find a review or other non-commercial site pertaining to the film.--Larrybob (talk) 21:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

POV edit

I have removed the following sections, which are unreferenced, POV and probably (at least partly) copyright violation.

"Booker was a diverse pianist who explored a variety of popular songs, ranging from jazz standards to rock. Rather than playing tunes in their original idioms, he integrated this repertoire into a virtuosic style that combined elements of blues, boogie-woogie, gospel, stride, Latin, and classical piano. An early innovator of rock and roll piano, he created sophisticated rhythmic structures combining both hands, while his virtuosity can be compared to stride and pianists Art Tatum and Oscar Peterson. Yet his rendition of standards has influenced many jazz pianists. Booker's left hand used various polished blues basses, repeated walk-ups, and unusual stride patterns, both in straight and shuffle rhythms. He also played entire chords in steady groups, divided by a lower note in the bassline, with a fluid improvisational style and complex voice-leading. He was noted for his abilities on the organ, and examples of his organ playing can be found on the album United Our Thing Will Stand. Booker also had a powerful, wide-ranged singing voice."

"==Quotes==

"I'm better than all of 'em."

"Music is a mysterious art... and people that's really good at it... they get a little taste of the mysterious... sometimes mysticism, too. In fact, all of the time they have mystical, mysterious attributes, but it's whether or not they're aware of it that's important."

James Booker"

More references, less fancruft would make the remaining article a better balanced, and more encyclopedic read. Thank you,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sinatra comparison edit

I don't think Tom McDermott's quote in the offbeat.com "Why Does James Booker Matter" article about James Booker's vocals could fairly be interpreted to mean that Booker "superseded the singing of Frank Sinatra." Someone reading the article with little or no exposure to James Booker's music might reasonably assume by the wikipedia writer's wording that Booker sang in a similar style to Sinatra, that the two musicians were an apples-to-apples comparison. I'd argue that such a direct comparison is kind of silly. I've loved both singers for many years, and would not deny Booker's gift as a vocalist, btw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2CD0:4F20:55CF:2834:90EC:A40 (talk) 04:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Image edit

Is it within policy to use an album cover as an image?

Also, I would be nice to have something about his use of an eye-patch (I don't know the answer), and the fact that it had a yellow star is probably not without meaning (sorry for the double negative) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrelevy (talkcontribs) 18:35, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bowdlerized edit

Much interesting, attested material and all reference to Booker's sex life have been removed fr/ this article. I will restore it. Tapered (talk) 06:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on James Booker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links edit

The "External links" need to be examined to see if some can be incorporated into the article or trimmed, per guidelines, as 13 links is generally considered link farming.