Talk:Jack Thorne
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Anarchyte in topic Requested move 16 September 2016
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jack Thorne article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 16 September 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved Jack Thorne (writer) to Jack Thorne and moved the disambiguation page to Jack Thorne (disambiguation). The disambiguation page can be dealt with elsewhere if need-be. (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:47, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Jack Thorne (writer) → Jack Thorne – This is the only Jack Thorne with a proper article, the other is one entry in a list of Jurassic Park characters. PatGallacher (talk) 21:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Pppery 00:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose as nom's rationale gives no reason to treat this as primary over the character. Dicklyon (talk) 00:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. The writer is supported by a full-length biographical article which confirms him as a major author. The fictional character, who exists solely as a redirect, can be mentioned in a hatnote atop the writer's entry. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 09:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support per Roman Spinner. CookieMonster755 𝚨-𝛀 06:40, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. SSTflyer 10:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Real people should always take precedence over fictional characters unless the latter are massively well-known (e.g. Harry Potter). A character in a single not especially well-known novel who doesn't even have his own article certainly doesn't count. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:07, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.