Talk:IG-11

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Hunter Kahn in topic GA Review
Good articleIG-11 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starIG-11 is part of the Characters from The Mandalorian series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 13, 2020Good article nomineeListed
September 26, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 3, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that IG-11, from the Star Wars series The Mandalorian, so closely resembles the character IG-88 that fans and journalists initially confused the two?
Current status: Good article

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:14, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Moved to mainspace by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self-nominated at 16:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC).Reply

  • Article long enough at 15,360 characters (2,540 words) "readable prose size". Article new enough, created December 1, 2019 as a redirect and became a non-redirect on January 17, 2020, Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 12 edits ago on January 17, 2020. Article is neutral and cites sources with inline citations. Earwig shows article is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism, with hits being mainly cited quotes. Hooks short enough, main hook is 156 and alt1 is 146 characters. Hooks are interesting to a broad audience and are neutral and do not focus unduly on negative aspects of living people. Hook facts are accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article. The QPQ was done.
  I think alt1 is much more interesting. I made the same mistake. The main hook sounds too subjective to me. --Nessie (📥) 05:15, 19 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:IG-11/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 11:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply


Comments

  • " bounty hunter droid" sea of blue. I thought it would link to an article about bounty hunter droids.
    • I wasn't sure how to resolve this without eliminating one of the wikilinks, so I removed the link to "bounty hunter" and kept the one for "droid". — Hunter Kahn 13:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • " an alien known" alien links to "extraterrestrial" but aren't pretty much all characters in Star Wars therefore alien?
  • "the Child" - the should be inside the pipe.
  • likewise for the Mandalorian.
  • " IG-11 is later repaired" was he really "killed"? He's a droid....
  • "nurse" doesn't need linking.
  • "mutual work together" probably could drop either mutual or together, it's somewhat tautological to have both.
  • " by reviewers and fans alike. He has been described as a fan favorite" maybe merge, " by reviewers and has been described as a fan favorite"...
    • Good call, I combined them. — Hunter Kahn 13:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "appeared ... appearance" is clunky.
    • I changed "appeared" simply to "was", though if you have a suggestion for a better word I'm open to it. — Hunter Kahn 13:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "outlawed in the galaxy." throughout the galaxy (and which galaxy?)
    • Well, the answer is the galaxy that Star Wars is set in, which doesn't have an actual name, which is why I just went with "the galaxy". LOL But to avoid confusion, I just removed "in the galaxy" from this sentence. — Hunter Kahn 13:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "In his first appearance on the show, IG-11" I don't think "on the show" is required.
  • " known as The Mandalorian" the Mandalorian.
  • That sentence has three "bounty"s
    • Reworded the second one; I think the other two are unavoidable because one identifies the Guild by its proper name, and the other identifies the profession of the Mandalorian. — Hunter Kahn 13:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "the asset to " first use of "asset", it's not clear this means the "unidentified living being" noted earlier.
    • Changed from "asset" to "being". — Hunter Kahn 13:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "a massive gunfight" I think "massive" is not encyclopedic in tone, perhaps "large".
  • as "The Child" -> as the Child.
  • "and kills him " again, wasn't he more "destroyed" than killed?
  • "protect",[9] When the" grammar fail.
    • Changed the comma to a period. — Hunter Kahn 13:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Imperial Scout Troopers and "stormtroopers" (not capitalised) both link to the same article.
    • Removed the second wikilink. — Hunter Kahn 13:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "a Mandalorian armorer in " as this links to a specific character, probably best to put "a Mandalorian" inside the pipe.
  • "the Terminator," put "the" inside the pipe.
  • "among fans due to their familiarity with" tighten this to "among fans familiar with"
  • Taika Waititi is overlinked.
    • Removed the wikilink under "Portrayal" so he's now only linked in the first reference in the body of the article. — Hunter Kahn 13:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Put (MCU) after the first expanded version of it.
    • Instead of doing this, I just changed "MCU" to "Marvel" so we wouldn't need to establish the acronym, if this works for you? — Hunter Kahn 13:56, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Link MVP, this isn't a common term outside the US.
  • Ref 31, spaced hyphen should be en-dash.

That's all I have. FWIW I thoroughly enjoyed the article, the above are suggestions which would probably propel it way beyond GA quality. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 11:55, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply