Talk:Hoyt–Schermerhorn Streets station

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cards84664 in topic Wrong station order
Good articleHoyt–Schermerhorn Streets station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 15, 2018Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 5, 2018.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that all of the proposals to honor Michael Jackson at New York City's Hoyt–Schermerhorn Streets subway station have been declined?

Naming edit

As can be seen on Wikipedia:WikiProject New York City Public Transportation/New York City Subway/station names, this station has many similar names. The map says Hoyt-Schermerhorn, signs say Hoyt-Schermerhorn Street, and timetables say Hoyt-Schermerhorn Streets. A couple weeks ago, a track worker was killed at the station. There are many articles from different newspapers, none of which use "Streets". Both "Street" and no suffix at all are used, but including "Street" is what the MTA does when it has the room. --NE2 08:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Hoyt-Schermerhorn Street" is grammatically incorrect, as Hoyt Street and Schermerhorn Street are different streets. "Streets" should be used. Tinlinkin 13:04, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
The previous title had the division and line moniker. My suggestion is we return back to that. Besides, the move was supposed to replace the en dash, but instead he unilaterally moved it without the two monikers. The only way we are going to get things done, NE2, is if you listen to other people have to say and not blatantly make your own decisions. As you said before, be bold, but don't be reckless. --Imdanumber1 (talk contribs) 18:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
The MTA and the media use "Street". I don't think they consider it gramatically incorrect. --NE2 19:31, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
The MTA is a really discombobulated organization of nonchalant and lazy people. I should know; my brother works for them. The present name is grammatically incorrect because there are two different streets that serve the station. If you think there are some errors they are unaware of, let them know. --Imdanumber1 (talk contribs) 00:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
I guess the MTA knows their signage is incorrect because service advisories use "Sts". The media follow from station signage, so that's why we see "Street". (I actually do not trust the media always on transit issues becuase their accuracy is often not perfect, but that's not a discussion I should pursue here.) Nearby Smith-Ninth Streets station mosaics use "Street" which I clearly think is not accurate. I definitely think all stations with intersections as station names must be indicated as such: as plural names. Tinlinkin 04:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
That's probably valid. --NE2 06:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Station layout edit

Hi, I am trying to make a station layout for this station. However, there is a problem: going eastbound into the station, the G train goes northbound, while the A C trains go southbound, and vice versa for the other direction. Should I just use "westbound" or "eastbound" for my layout, or do I need to do something else? Epic Genius 20:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epicgenius (talkcontribs)

You have already created one layout for a similar case: Seventh Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line). Your solution there seems to be correct. Vcohen (talk) 20:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:163rd Street–Amsterdam Avenue (IND Eighth Avenue Line) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hoyt–Schermerhorn Streets (New York City Subway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoyt–Schermerhorn Streets (New York City Subway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Archer Avenue Lines which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

JFK Express edit

@Kew Gardens 613 and Epicgenius: The lede mentions the JFK Express service using the outer platforms until the 1990s, but the prose doesn't mention the service and says 1981. Which is correct? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:10, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I don't think the JFK Express stopped here. According to the JFK Express page, The route [...] ran express to Jay Street–Borough Hall in Downtown Brooklyn. From that point on, it ran non-stop on the IND Fulton Street Line and IND Rockaway Line to Howard Beach–JFK Airport. it is cited to this source. I have removed mention of the JFK Express here. epicgenius (talk) 13:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wrong station order edit

For some reason, the G train is listed as going to Court Square via Bergen Street and to Church Avenue via Fulton Street even though it should be reversed. Someone please fix this. SteelersDiclonious (talk) 02:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Epicgenius: Do you know what happened here? Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 14:51, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Kew Gardens 613: @SteelersDiclonious: That's on me, I got myself twisted around looking at maps. I'll fix that now. Cards84664 14:55, 8 July 2022 (UTC)Reply