Talk:Harry Kane/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Requested moves

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. Our naming criteria do take into account the question of what readers are likely to be looking for, and in this case it appears that the footballer is presently more popular than all other topics combined. It might be argued that other topics are important historically, but none appears to be so important as to overwhelm the importance of the current topic. Although his circumstances may change in the future, consensus can also change when that happens. bd2412 T 23:11, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

• Harry Kane (footballer) → Harry Kane
• Harry Kane → Harry Kane (disambiguation)

– WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The pageview numbers show that when our readers are looking for information on "Harry Kane", this is overwhelmingly who they want. How overwhelmingly? Over the past 90 days, over 99% percent of pageviews among all four articles on a Harry Kane went to this Harry Kane. It has been viewed 281 times as often as the second-most viewed (the turn-of-the-century baseball player), and 109 times as often as the other three put together. Even the disambiguation page gets considerably more views than the articles on the other Harry Kanes, being viewed nearly 13 times as often as the baseball player and 5 times as often as the three non-football Harry Kanes put together.

Harry Kane (footballer): 98502 views

Harry Kane the disambiguation page: 4533 views

Harry Kane (baseball): 350 views

Harry Kane (hurdler): 278 views

Harry Kane (illustrator): 269 views

None of the other three Harry Kanes appear to suggest any long-term significance claims to offset the strong usage claim for primary topic. Egsan Bacon (talk) 16:37, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

• Support – When I started this article there was no indication of how successful Kane the footballer would be, and he barely ranked alongside the other Harry Kanes. But now it's clear that the footballer is the primary topic, and if anything, he will become more notable in the future. Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
• Support - Per nom. Makes complete sense to me... JMHamo (talk) 16:58, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. JMHamo (talk) 17:00, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose - classic case of WP:RECENT, 21 year old footballer not going to be known to baseball, hurdling or illustration fans. And the primary topic in Google Books is Harry Kane, character in the Harold Pinter play The Collection (play) 1961. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
• Support - I think it's important that we always take recentism into account, especially when it involves displacing figures that would otherwise have very high significance. However, this is a case where the page views indicate such an overwhelming primary topic of interest to the readers that we can improve navigation by making a primary topic. Reader interest when indicated at such overwhelming levels should probably not be ignored, sort of like how Paul Ryan was made the primary despite recentism concerns. And it's not like this is a case of, say, Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song) being put over Paparazzi due to page views -- none of the other topics have a particularly strong claim to overcoming this reader interest.--Yaksar (let's chat) 05:47, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose - I don't think page views, given his recent run-of-form, are much to go on; and his other achievements do not set him above the other Harry Kanes. Conclusion - not a PRIMARYTOPIC. GiantSnowman 09:58, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose - I don't see why this Harry Kane is more notable than the others. IJA (talk) 17:49, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

  That's not a reason to oppose. Unreal7 (talk) 16:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

@Unreal7: - This footballer has scored ten goals for Spurs so far this season and because of this he has received a lot of media attention; there has also been speculation that he could be called up to the England national football team but he was not selected in the end for last Saturday's and tomorrow's international matches. This article has had a higher than normal visitor stat due to his the recent media attention, because of this I Oppose this WP:RM per WP:RECENT as he is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC at this moment in time. He might be in the future, but as things stand, this isn't the case; it would be wrong to suggest that he is likely to become the Primary Topic in the future per WP:CRYSTAL. He could flop soon and work his way down the leagues and not receive much media attention ever again. Is this a reason to oppose? Regards IJA (talk) 23:59, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Much better. Unreal7 (talk) 00:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

• In doubt - I'm a man of rules, and like them to be respected. As such, the visitor stat criterion is overwhelming. But at the same time, WP:RECENT is definitely an issue as well. You throw a dog with a hat on into English football, and he'll take away the visitor stats as well. (if you're honest though, given his young age, the footballer will still be the "recent" topic for another fifteen years) Additional food for thought, what other WPs think: Q1586593 and Q969725, although that's because most WPs do not list the other namesakes. Most important issue I have with primary topics, everyone putting Harry Kane between square brackets will automatically link to the footballer, without getting a warning that may not be the person he's after. It's the main reason I have an issue with these primary topics. If only something could be done to remedy that problem. Just my thoughts... --Midas02 (talk) 13:29, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
• Support - As displayed by the nominator, none of the other Harry Kanes are even nearly as notable as the footballer. Unreal7 (talk) 16:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose - As too soon, this player has had literally a quarter of one successful season. May be in a year or two consider WP:PRIMARY, but per WP:RECENT, let's hold fire for now. Fenix down (talk) 09:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose - The footballer has been media favourite for a short time but that does not mean he should be moved. The interest will most likely calm down (it usually does) and we will have to see in the future if the footballer is worth moving. QED237 (talk) 12:17, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
• Support. Unnecessary to hinder the navigation of 99% of users right now when we can see what article they are looking for. If he ceases to be the primary topic due to recency abating, this can be reevaluated later, but the usage statistics are overwhelming per Egsan Bacon. Dekimasuよ! 20:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
• Additional Comment: Here are the pageview stats for this article for the past two years. Dismissing reader interest as the result of a sudden interest by the media or a few good games would appear to be a mistake, as the article still gets plenty of views even when there are no games at all.

Month	Views	90 day views
Nov 12	5681
Dec 12	6804
Jan 13	9755	22240
Feb 13	16636	33195
Mar 13	7336	33727
Apr 13	6789	30761
May 13	8188	22313
Jun 13	13469	28446
Jul 13	6098	27755
Aug 13	12023	31590
Sep 13	11019	29140
Oct 13	16507	39549
Nov 13	7135	34661
Dec 13	4209	27851
Jan 14	9313	20657
Feb 14	5893	19415
Mar 14	12225	27431
Apr 14	37537	55655
May 14	11070	60832
Jun 14	4961	53568
Jul 14	8544	24575
Aug 14	19888	33393
Sep 14	14311	42743
Oct 14	37786	71985
Nov 14	36968	89065

The lowest level of reader interest over the past two years was from December 2013 to February 2014, and the article was still viewed 19415 times. Again, the other three combined received a total of 897 views over the past 90 days. Even if the current interest in Harry Kane was as low as the lowest it has been in the last two years, it would still be viewed over 55 times as often as the baseball player and over 21 times as often as the other three combined. Of course, it woud not have received over 99% of the pageviews. It would, instead, have received a mere 95.6% of pageviews.

Also worth noting is that the second most viewed page, the one on Harry Kane the baseball player, is not about some star of the dead ball era, or even a journeyman. He was a player whose Major League career consisted of just 15 games over four seasons, the last of which was 1906. (MLB seasons at the time were 140 games each during his first two seasons, and 154 games each his last two.) In those 15 games, he performed poorly - below replacement level, to the extent such things can be measured over just 15 games using the statistics available from the time. To whatever extent Harry Kane the football player may or may not be known among baseball fans, it is safe to say Harry Kane the baseball player is not known among baseball fans. He's no Noodles Hahn. Egsan Bacon (talk) 18:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose. If there's a primary topic at all, it's the Pinter character by overwhelming long-term significance. But the best option is to leave as is. Wildly differing results depending on which criteria are used, as here, are an excellent indication of no primary topic. Andrewa (talk) 16:59, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

• Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. As is demonstrated above by Egsan Bacon, the article for the footballer garned significantly more views than the other Harry Kanes even before his recent high level of media attention. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:57, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment: This appears to be an excellent illustration of why we don't rely on page views as the ultimate test of primary topic. And we don't of course. Andrewa (talk) 05:13, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
• Support. It's as if to some people, the first criterion of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC just doesn't exist. I don't get it. Red Slash 01:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
• Support. The page view evidence suggests this is far and away the primary topic in that regard. In regards to recentism and long-term significance, the fact that he has already played at a top level in soccer for several years puts him at a similar level of significance as the baseball player and hurdler, who did the same in their respective sports. I see no reason to keep readers away from what they're overwhelmingly looking for.--Cúchullain ^t/c 18:49, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
• Support Yes, Kane has been the subject of increased recent attention, but it's completely reasonable to assume that he will continue to be the most-sought article of this name for years to come. Compare to Luis Suárez (RM). This could change, of course, if he suffers a career-ending injury or something, but that's WP:CRYSTAL, not assuming that current trends will continue. --BDD (talk) 20:15, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Untitled

Whoever vandalized Kane's Wikipedia page before the protective security lock was placed on it altered his England U21 appearances and goals record. It presently reads "played 12, scored 13." It should read Played 10, scored 8. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.121.156 (talk) 17:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Done. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 18:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

This edit introduced a factual error in August 2014, which has only now been corrected. Thanks, C679 18:10, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2015

I would like to edit the international goals tally of Harry Kane scoring against Sudan but losing 4-1 Robbie Woodrow (talk) 11:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Edgars2007 (talk/contribs) 14:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

That never, uh, happened, did it, Robbie? '''tAD''' (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

References

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Harry Kane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 07:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

On it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

I would like to be informed of issues on this GA, even if I was not the nominator, as I have contributed a lot to the article. '''tAD''' (talk) 17:46, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

@The Almightey Drill: Sure thing! Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:04, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Danke '''tAD''' (talk) 20:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

@Royroydeb:, @The Almightey Drill: please find my review below:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Just some smaller things to do here:

• Generally, the article could do with some more prose that does not just say he played here, he scored there. I am aware that might be difficult for his earlier years, but at least for last season, there must be many articles on him, profiles and so forth?
• A Personal life section is missing completely.
• 2012-13 season: Spurs recalled him four months early, so when exactly was that? February? Should be clarified.
• Youth teams: end of second paragraph: fine run is not NPOV.
• Youth teams: He was called up for the 2015 Euro. And what happened there? Please expand.

That's about all I could find. Good work so far! On hold for seven days. Zwerg Nase (talk) 18:34, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Zwerg Nase: I know you have seen issue before on articles which are too focussed on matchday details, but in this case, I think through the style of play section, one can see the evolution of Kane from an infrequent scorer who was mostly cast out on loan, and eventually the centrepiece of Tottenham and hyped-up England hopeful. As for personal life, I could have a look into that. We already have details on his childhood – albeit the parts related to football – and the fact of his Irish ancestry, I'm not sure what else to put. Most personal life sections include criminal record, famous relatives, dates, endorsements, and I'm not really sure how much of that relates to Kane. '''tAD''' (talk) 18:58, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

I could respond as I was not active, but thanks to tAD to make the changes. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 08:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Zwerg Nase what to do next? RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 07:34, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

@Royroydeb:, @The Almightey Drill: I feel that, even if just short, a personal life section should be there. There are several articles concerning it to be found (like 1, 2, 3. I know that this yellow press stuff is annoying, but well, that's the way it is, especially in the UK. Also, there are some profile pieces from his breakout period that might work to expand on both 2014-15 season and Style of play, like 1, 2 and 3. And that was just a quick search by me, I'm sure there's more. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

@Zwerg Nase: Wow! Thanks for those resources. Not sure if I agree with the "long-term season ticket holder" that Spurs haven't had a hometown hero since the 1970s (!), one Ledley King springs immediately to mind '''tAD''' (talk) 13:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

@Zwerg Nase:, please have a look. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 11:18, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Looks good now, congratulations, it's a pass :) Please mind though: A lot of GAs about active footballers lose their eligibility quite quickly when no-one looks after the article. It would be great if you guys keep the article on this good level. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 September 2015

Update information 106.51.20.103 (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 18:18, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Cite Error

There's a cite error displayed under career statistics. --146.199.175.119 (talk) 23:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Personal awards update

This section needs an update. Kane won both Premier League Player of the Month and MOTD's goal of the month for March 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipedia has annoying username rules (talk • contribs) 16:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Another award he has won since then, http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10894298/harry-kane-wins-pfa-fans-premier-league-player-of-the-season-award46.7.195.132 (talk) 22:30, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Kane is the only English player to be nominated for the 2017 FIFA World Player of the Year Award: http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11675/10992607/harry-kane-the-only-british-player-on-fifas-player-of-the-year-shortlist46.7.195.132 (talk) 15:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Development..

I am not sure the comment that he was a back up to Soldado reflects the correct view. At the time Spurs also had Adebayor in the side, who had lost his place in the team due to disciplinary issues with the the the coach Andre Villas-Boas. AVB played Soldado as the lone striker at this time. When he was replaced by Sherwood, the first thing he did was to reinstate Adebayor as well as give Kane his chance in the team. Far from being a back-up to Soldado, Sherwood claims that Spurs wanted to send Kane out on loan yet again, but he persuaded AVB not to do this. As we know, Kane became pretty much an instant success and played every remaining game that season. Prior to becoming manager, Sherwood was the Youth development manager, and was responsible for overseeing Kane's training.

However, when Pochettino replaced Sherwood, Kane became the third choice striker behind Adebayor and Soldado, and was only given his chance by Pochettino when both these players showed poor form, while Kane was scoring consistently in the Europa League.46.7.85.68 (talk) 09:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harry Kane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150215110639/http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/news/news/2014-15/feb/130215-harry-kane-and-ronald-koeman-win-barclays-january-awards.html to http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/news/news/2014-15/feb/130215-harry-kane-and-ronald-koeman-win-barclays-january-awards.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Anyway, I've replace that ref with an existing one, also from the Premiership web.--Gorpik (talk) 08:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 May 2017

Change 'As of matches played on 18 May 2017' to 'As of match played on 21 May 2017' VEditor (talk) 16:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

 Already done Altamel (talk) 19:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2017

I have found two items which are in the wrong order. Currently the ref tag is before the comma but it should be the other way round. This is found after "7–1 crushing of Hull City". 86.147.131.235 (talk) 15:29, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Done Izno (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Izno I have also noticed a repeated 'City' very close to the sentence I have mentioned earlier so that should be removed to avoid repeated words. 86.147.131.235 (talk) 21:32, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Got it. --Izno (talk) 01:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

England Captaincy.

No mention that Kane was appointed England Captain for the game v Scotland?46.7.195.132 (talk) 10:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 August 2017

Please change Kane was also eligible for the Republic of Ireland through his father, who was born in Galway to Kane was also eligible for the Republic of Ireland through his Grandfather who was born in Galway see reference at : http://connachttribune.ie/harry-kane-hes-one-of-our-own-909/ Dawros (talk) 17:42, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Not done: The article you linked says Kane's grandfather was born in Dawros near Letterfrack; it has no mention of Galway. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 19:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 September 2017

In the international goals section, the recently added rows have been done partially wrong. The scores e.g. 0–4 in the score column and results should be swapped since this does not work with the description above the table. This was added by [Vivalavida22]. 86.180.163.70 (talk) 13:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Fixed. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:58, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harry Kane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150311145830/http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/news/news/2014-15/mar/090315-alan-shearer-on-diego-costa-sergio-aguero-harry-kane-charlie-austin.html to http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/news/news/2014-15/mar/090315-alan-shearer-on-diego-costa-sergio-aguero-harry-kane-charlie-austin.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Image Update

Hi there.

Can someone update the profile image to something more recent please? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by MSJC85 (talk • contribs) 03:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

2018 season

On 25th Feb, he scored the only goal in a 1-0 victory away to Crystal Palace, thus bringing his total for club goals in all competitions to 150.46.7.195.132 (talk) 22:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

And? Mattythewhite (talk) 22:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

150 Goals is considered a "landmark". Or was I too subtle? See? I too can be sarcastic. Can I suggest that if you don't think it worthy of inclusion, you say so rather than indulging in sarcasm?46.7.195.132 (talk) 01:22, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Just because it's a vague landmark doesn't mean it needs to be mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.96.14.189 (talk) 16:57, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Goal vs Stoke

Should the mocking Kane got for claiming the goal that was initially awarded to Eriksen but overruled by the Premier League panel be included. Those that mocked him include Lineker, Salah, Roma FC and a non league club. Delle Ali says he would have done the same. Mobile mundo (talk) 15:40, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 July 2018

In an interview given in February 2015, Kane said that he was in a relationship with Katie Goodland, whom he has known since childhood.[180] He told Esquire magazine, "We went to school together, so she's seen my whole career. Of course, she's finding it a little crazy. I think she's even been in the papers a couple of times taking the dogs out."[148] They have two Labrador dogs Brady and Wilson, named after NFL quarterbacks Tom Brady and Russell Wilson.[181] Kane and Goodland announced the birth of their first child, Ivy Jane Kane, on 8 January 2017.[182] On 1 July, Kane announced his engagement to Goodland on his Twitter account.[183] I would like to add - In January 2018, Harry Kane announced that he and Kate are expecting their second child. https://twitter.com/HKane/status/956901755639533569

Thank you. Gracesaunders (talk) 19:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

 Done --Danski454 (talk) 12:05, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Erratum

Harry Kane's debut for Millwall 0n 2nd January 2012 was against Bristol City

The page is protected — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.238.231.109 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

 Fixed Thanks. Nzd (talk) 07:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

References

Calendar Year

I don't see the significance of "calendar year" records for leagues that are not played over the course of a calendar year. It seems arbitrary. It would make sense as a way of comparing leagues that started and finished at different times of the year, however the top leagues of England, Spain, France, Germany and Italy all run from August to May, so assuming that Kane's European record relates only to those Top 5 leagues, what use is this "calendar year" stat? It is no more or less useful than tracking the top goalscorer of the financial year or any other period lasting 365 (or 366) days. --Jameboy (talk) 16:37, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

@Jameboy: I would personally agree with that, but a big thing was made of the record in the media so I think it's notable enough for inclusion. Nzd (talk) 23:34, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

@Nzd: It's difficult to argue with that. As an encyclopedia, we can only go with the sources we have, and as you say, these records were widely reported in the media. But the media often acts as something of an echo chamber, just repeating information from elsewhere without applying any critical thinking. Since I haven't found any source that brings the relevance of the calendar year records into question, there probably isn't much to be done. Oh well. --Jameboy (talk) 13:54, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2018

please let me edit harry kane's photo in this website Anuchak2007 (talk) 10:30, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Please make your request for a new image to be uploaded to Files For Upload. Once the file has been properly uploaded, feel free to reactivate this request to have the new image used. Danski454 (talk) 10:34, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2018

I want to change Kane's infobox photo with a more recent one . I plan to use either image ("Harry Kane 2018-06-281") or image ("Harry Kane 2018-07-031") Guineapig2500 (talk) 14:41, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

I've searched Wikimedia Commons for those images and they don't appear to exist. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:06, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

::But they do . Just go to Category:Harry Kane in Commons and you will find the pictures . Thats where I got them from in the first place .Guineapig2500 (talk) 15:15, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2018

I want to change the infobox photo of Kane . I will either use image ("Harry Kane 2018-06-281.jpg") or image ("Harry Kane 2018-07-031.jpg"). If you can't find them directly go to Commons > Category:Harry Kane > images number 54 and 55 going to the right from the first photo . Guineapig2500 (talk) 15:34, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

 Not done (User:Guineapig2500 is a sockpuppet of User:X027.) Govvy (talk) 18:55, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

2018-19

This is an edit request : Kane scored against Brighton , twice against Huddersfield , Wolves in the League and against PSV in the Champions League ; twice in the home fixture and once away . Rocket blastoff (talk) 07:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 November 2018

Kane scored against Brighton , twice against Huddersfield , and Wolves in the League and against PSV in the Champions League ; twice in the home fixture and once away . Rocket blastoff (talk) 07:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

 Not done We don't need to record every goal in prose, simply not necessary Govvy (talk) 11:13, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 November 2018

Kane's away goal and home brace against PSV in the Champions League took his Europe goals' tally to 23 , equalling Jermain Defoe's record of most European goals by a Tottenham Hotspur F.C. player. I have this from www.Google.com and Tottenham Hotspur : Records and Statistics Rocket blastoff (talk) 16:27, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Google.com is a search engine and not a reliable source.Tym Whittier (talk) 01:59, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

 Not done This user is a troll, sockpuppet, Govvy (talk) 11:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 November 2018

Kane's goals against PSV took his Europe goals tally to 23 , so another european goal would make him Tottenham's most prolific European goalscorer , ahead of Jermaine Defoe , who too has 23 . I have this from : Kane levels record of 'one of the best' 223.176.81.244 (talk) 07:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

That's a source, but we'd prefer to see a reference to a more independent source, not the football club talking about one of its own players. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:20, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Half a mo' , I'll see to it ... 223.176.87.124 (talk) 09:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

This is also there at Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Statistics . And the person who last uploaded the most Europe goals' table must have cited something . 223.176.87.124 (talk) 09:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

 Not done This user is a troll, sockpuppet, if this is asked again, all posts will be removed. Govvy (talk) 11:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 November 2018

This link is proof that Kane will be Tottenham's highest European championships' goalscorer with just another goals , after his three goals against PSV in the champions league - www.tottenham hotspur.com/news/2018/november/our-top-european-goalscorers/ 223.176.84.4 (talk) 09:55, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

When he scores, anyway, you really need to stop, creating all these accounts, socking, trolling, it's not helping your cause. Govvy (talk) 11:31, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 February 2019

Please add England Player of the Year 2018 to individual honours <ref:http://www.thefa.com/news/2019/jan/18/harry-kane-player-of-the-year-180119> Andycwalker (talk) 13:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

 Done with thanks. NiciVampireHeart 02:24, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Stated Age Error

In second sentence of last paragraph of introduction, article states “He has appeared and scored at every youth level, and made his senior debut in March 2015 at age 22...” If subject is born on 28 July 1993, he would have been 21 in March 2015. Therefore, please change “age 22” to “age 21.” Additionally, please change listed DOB from “28 July 1993” to “27 July 1993,” according to the following g: https://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/teams/first-team/players/harry-kane/Crmaloney2 (talk) 20:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

@Crmaloney2: Thanks, I've fixed the age in the lead. The ref used in the body states he was 21 and this is backed up by maths. I think you must have misread the birthdate on the Spurs profile though (unless they've changed it since you posted), it definitely says 28 July 1993. Nzd (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Not sure why, Nzd, but it says 27 July 1993 on my end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crmaloney2 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

No I have his biography and it states that he was born on 28th Mvalm (talk) 18:05, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2019

Update bio (right hand box) to show latest club. 86.15.234.123 (talk) 20:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Izno (talk) 20:16, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Raheem Sterling which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Has RMCD bot gone a bit crazy? Iggy (Swan) 14:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

I couldn't see what it was going on about earlier, I just thought it was broken! Govvy (talk) 14:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

I think I found the answer. Iggy (Swan) 14:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Aaaa, k, surprised that IP didn't get blocked. Govvy (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Career stats

Hi , Kane has scored 10goals from 13 matches this season . Since when have 6 and 4 made 9 ?

Semi-protected edit request on 15 August 2019

"He scored in both match against Cypriot opposition AEL Limassol" should be "He scored in both matches against Cypriot opposition AEL Limassol" 87.254.16.162 (talk) 16:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

 Done AmericanAir88^(talk) 18:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

career stats

I am on the wikipedia app , and it can't send edit requests . Kane has scored 10 goals this season , not 9 . And my samsung keyboard does not have tildes , so won't be able to sign . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:314F:B247:14D:EB2D:DD75:915E (talk) 15:40, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for assisting with the error spotting on the article. He has scored 10 goals upto October 2019.

Re "samsung keyboard does not have tildes", I would think yours would have that option. On mine, I'd found it by pressing "Sym", then "1/2" buttons then use the symbol directly below the "2" to get your character when signing. This may be different on what you're using. Iggy (Swan) (What I've been doing to maintain Wikipedia) 22:30, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 December 2020

ank edit requests will be declined. -->

Harry kane is a profilic goalscorer }} 138.207.193.47 (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 April 2021

He moved to 2nd in all time Tottenham scorers in February 2021, not Feb 2020 82.34.202.108 (talk) 13:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Appears to have been altered now to 2021 - should it be edited back then? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.9.7.102 (talk • contribs) 09:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2021

2A02:C7F:3ADA:6200:8C7F:8FB1:45A2:7D54 (talk) 22:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Harry Kane has 220 Tottenham goals

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:19, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

The IP didn't exactly say what he wanted done, don't know why you're asking for sources for basic facts that are already sourced in the article! Govvy (talk) 16:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2021

Harry Kane finished 10th for the Ballon d'Or in both 2017 and 2018. This used to be on his page but has since been removed. He finished as top scorer in qualifying for Euro 2020 but is not included. It seems a lot of his personal awards or placings have been taken out. Would someone be able to amend them back please? Thanks. 92.15.64.125 (talk) 18:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. Both seem to me to be over-specific, trivial distinctions that are not that important in the grand scheme of things. He didn't win the Ballon d'Or, and the qualifying one is a small scenario. That being said, if there is consensus for these changes, then go for it. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 18:21, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 July 2021

~~Harry is now number : 9

 Not done. You mean the infobox? It's correct there, he's 10 on the Hotspurs. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 07:09, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Ireland national team eligibility error

Unlike claimed in the article, Kane was never eligible to represent Republic of Ireland. Quite possibly he could have gained such eligibility had he wanted to, but as he never applied for Irish citizenship that was never factually the case. -78.27.124.159 (talk) 09:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Random 6?

I just noticed that a random "6" has been added in Kane's infobox where it says "England U20", making it "England6 U20". I believe it was added as a mistake as it seems to have been introduced in a mobile edit (the classic small phone keyboard probably struck again). It would be very appreciated if someone could edit it to remove this error (if it is an error). --CybJubal (talk) 23:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

UPDATE: It has now been fixed. This is now irrelevant. --CybJubal (talk) 20:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 December 2021

Kane scored a penalty in the Euro 2020 final on 11 July 2021. This is missing from the 'List of international goals scored by Harry Kane' table. 84.71.53.116 (talk) 14:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Kane scored in the penalty shoot-out, which isn't part of the match itself and therefore doesn't count towards his international goals tally. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Semi protected edit request

Introduction fourth para

As of 26th March 2022, Harry Kane is Englands second highest goalscorer, with a tally of 49 international goals. Source — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheAlfman (talk • contribs) 11:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 April 2022

Russell Wilson now plays for the Denver Broncos. 86.10.59.0 (talk) 19:15, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

 Partly done: I actually just removed the team names there as it's not really relevant to this article, and it'll probably be missed when their team changes (for example, it took six months for someone to update Brady's move from the Patriots to the Buccaneers). ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 21:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Now someone has changed the reference to Zach Wlison. The referenced article, and other public comments made by Harry Kane, support the original statement that the dog was named after Russell Wilson. AnneItaandDavid (talk) 20:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)