Talk:Gravity (Lecrae album)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleGravity (Lecrae album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 27, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 16, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the first recordings of Gravity began in May 2012?

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gravity (Lecrae album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 12:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

  • I would split the lead into two sections, but that is optional
  • ", from the iTunes deluxe edition of the album peaked at" - comma not needed
  • Why was the album nominated for Best Gospel Album, yet the genre does not seem to be well-presented on that album
  • There are a lot of comments on Rapzilla from people who wonder that too. Basically, it was put in that category because the Best Rock or Rap Gospel Album category was removed this year. Why the album wasn't put in Best Contemporary Christian Music or Best Rap Album, or both, I don't know. I'll put info in about the Best Rock or Rap Gospel Album category being removed.--¿3family6 contribs 15:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • In the infobox, next to Recorded, the m-dash should be an n-dash
  • Next to Producer, is it possible to pluralize the word?
  • I think the first paragraph of the Background section includes information that is not relevant to this album. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_guide#Background, that section should provide important information that influenced a particular album. Suggest trimming it down, removing all the chart positions and awards. The next paragraph is OK.
  • "chiefly The Watchmen, consisting of J.R., Alex Medina, and Wit,[21][24][26] and Heat Academy, which is under the direction of Street Symphony.[21]" - confusing sentence. Is the "and" ahead Wit necessary?
  • You link Tedashii twice in that section
  • "Billboard included news about Gravity in its daily news show The Beat.[41]" - suggest, Billboard reported about Gravity in its daily news show The Beat
  • "This version includes 3 bonus songs featuring appearances from Suzy Rock" - 3 should be three
  • ""Mayday" featuring Big K.R.I.T. and Ashthon Jones," - add a comma after Mayday
  • "featuring Big K.R.I.T. and Ashthon Jones" - that is already stated
  • Quotation marks in quotation marks should be converted to apostrophes, like 'Lord Have Mercy'
  • "cover as a combination of the covers of" - suggest "of the ones of"
  • "and compared the promotional art to the promotional art" - ditto
  • References could use some clean-up. Accessdates, publishers are missing, Web notation not needed, Ref 6 one period too much, Ref 65 consists of a bare url
  • Two dead links: [1]--Tomcat (7) 12:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gravity (Lecrae album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply