Talk:Gerry Duggan (writer)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Pyrrho the Skeptic in topic Not currently writing Deadpool?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gerry Duggan (writer) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Which photo is a better choice for the Infobox? edit
-
1 -
2 -
3
Does the community prefer the kind of photo with shadows (2 and 3), or without (1)? I'd like to hear your opinions. Nightscream (talk) 18:42, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- 1 or 2 but not 3. Slight preference to 1 maybe, but as indicated, would be fine with 2 as well. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- Well, I'd prefer 3, but I'm perfectly happy with 2. Although now I've noticed that 3 has a shiny forehead, so I'm less inclined to that one.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- I prefer option 1 for the angle more than the lighting. Option 3 is also a good photo. The angle of option 2 does not appeal to me. Argento Surfer (talk) 19:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- 3 is good. Decent color depth, good composition, less shine off his head, and the portrait is better distinguished from the background than 1. Guy (Help!) 19:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
* 3! ...but the others are pretty good too. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Changing to #1. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- When you click on the images, 1 is the best one in terms of being able to see the face clearly and more neutrally. The background is not good, especially in thumbnail form, but the article is about the person and not the background. Mkdw talk 19:39, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- First choice, 1: a bit dark in the foreground, but the angle is good and the subject's hair doesn't disappear into the background. Second choice, 2: acceptable angle but the hair disappears and there's too much shine in the center of forehead. Distant third choice, 3: same as for 2 but unacceptable angle for image at right of page. RivertorchFIREWATER 02:24, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- True, true. Good points! I'm changing my pick. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose 3 as it is inferior to the other two. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 19:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- 1 - Yes, definitely 1, not 3. Definitely, definitely. But 2 is okayish. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- 1 is my favorite, especially if the background is blurred or blocked out. Lexein (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- 1, 3, 2 in order of preference starting with most liked. I would like the background made darker on 1, though; I could do it if people want it. Alden Loveshade (talk) 21:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Not currently writing Deadpool? edit
I believe Duggan is not currently writing Deadpool, and the paragraph in the Career section could be updated. I will make the edit if no one objects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk • contribs) 23:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)