Talk:Gene Cipriano

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did you know nomination

Wrecking Crew merger? edit

Couldn't this article (being so short) be merged with that of the Wrecking Crew of which he was a member? Editrite! (talk) 09:41, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

I've started expanding the article - there is much more that could and should (and perhaps will) be added from reliable sources. He is quite obviously independently notable. There is no case for a merge. Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:50, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that Gene Cipriano played the saxophone part for Tony Curtis' character in the film Some Like It Hot? Source: “ Gene Cipriano, a saxophonist who played on thousands of pop and jazz recordings and whose music was a part of dozens of films and television shows, died of natural causes on Nov. 12 at his home in Studio City, Calif. He was 94.....He ghosted the saxophone part for Tony Curtis’ character in the iconic film Some Like It Hot.” Source: WBGO

Created by Thriley (talk) and Ghmyrtle (talk). Nominated by Thriley (talk) at 00:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC).Reply

  • Just a comment that the Notability tag has been added twice, by different editors. I do not think there is any basis for it remaining - any notability questions should by now have been fully addressed in expanding the article - but it would be up to another editor to remove it - not myself nor Thriley as we created and expanded the page. Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:05, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   Dr Salvus

Promoted. Dr Salvus 21:32, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • I just added two obits to the article, one from the Hollywood Reporter and the other from Billboard. I think the notability tag is unwarranted. Thriley (talk) 02:58, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • @Thriley and Dr Salvus: how about this ALT? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 00:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • ALT1: ... that Gene Cipriano played oboe for many of the pop hits of the 1960s and '70s, including some by the Beach Boys and the Monkees?
  • See related thread at WT:DYK#Gene Cipriano: interesting because of oboe? -- RoySmith (talk) 17:27, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Perhaps this hook could be saved for the day of the Academy Awards: ALT2: ... that Gene Cipriano played in the Academy Awards orchestra continuously for 59 years? Thriley (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
    I like ALT2 in theory, but it needs a WP:RS. In the article, it's sourced to https://makinglifeswing.com/, which is a blog. The other problem is "continuously for 59 years" means they never stopped playing, even for bio breaks (yeah, I know the source uses "continuously", but it's still wrong). -- RoySmith (talk) 22:41, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
    I understand your point but it's actually appropriate usage. It's like saying Jack's Restaurant has been operating on Main Street continuously for 50 years -- doesn't mean they were open 24 hours all that time. I think something could be done with played on hundreds of recording sessions, possibly more than any other woodwind musician. EEng 05:29, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
    There's a dfference between saying a business has been operating continuously and saying a person has been playing an instrument continuously.--User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 19:28, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
    It's a subtle point of usage and I'm afraid we'll just have to agree to disagree. EEng 03:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
T:DYK/P5