Talk:Gejang

Latest comment: 1 year ago by KAVEBEAR in topic Chinese version

To do list edit

The following list should be added to the article sometime later.

  • History
  • Crabs and fisheries
  • Eating - eaten as banchan. This food has been considered a quality food and
  • Popularity - Gejang is one of best selling items for online shopping. Sinsa-dong has a dedicated alley to gejang.
  • Safety and caution

--Caspian blue (talk) 17:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

"The it has begun" edit

The grammar "the it has begun" seems strange (added in this edit). Badagnani (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blanked editing questions edit

See [1]. The questions were not addressed, yet the questions were nonetheless blanked. Badagnani (talk) 02:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Only to only edit

The "only to only" that the user tried to insert to the article is not a correct English. Before saying something on my grammar, the user should look the user's own behavior first.--Caspian blue (talk) 02:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've just examined the article and don't see that it says "only to only"; it would be helpful if you would provide a diff. If I noticed that I had made a grammatical error, I would not have objected to fixing it, or allowing another editor to fix it. As editors, our readers should be foremost in our minds, and getting the article just right (and grammatically correct) is really important. That means not reimposing errors repeatedly, after they have been pointed out. Badagnani (talk) 03:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
diff 1diff 2 as the evidences. --Caspian blue (talk) 03:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
This is a bad mistake, which should be fixed. But it's not a good idea to replace improper grammar with other improper grammar. That is why discussion such as this is so important to help in making the best article possible. Badagnani (talk) 03:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Talk page is for question and discussion edit

The user named Badagnani should address his/her question to here, not to the article. Not only would none notice the hidden remark, but also just make editors who actually expand the content get annoyed by it. The user's false accusation of "blanking" is very disruptive as well.--Caspian blue (talk) 02:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Anon's changes edit

This edit seems strange; can it please be reversed? Is this one of our regular editors who has somehow gotten logged out? Badagnani (talk) 03:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

This page has nothing to do with the above user's own business. If the above user accuses again with the false implication, the user must go to WP:RFCU with evidences. Fortunately, the user seems to have an ardent fan along with Jacque NgGuyen. It is no wonder why the user always attracts such people (from CJKV)--Caspian blue (talk) 03:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Shell edit

The article should state whether or not the shell is eaten. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.100.194.231 (talk) 00:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gejang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Gejang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Chinese version edit

Isn’t there a Chinese marinated crab way of eating as well especially in the Chaoshan region in Southern China? KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply