Talk:Günther Freiherr von Maltzahn
Latest comment: 6 years ago by K.e.coffman in topic Recent edit
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Günther Freiherr von Maltzahn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
An image of Maltzahn edit
@K.e.coffman: May you please reinsert File:Günther von Maltzahn.jpg and take it to FFD please? This image may have some potential use. The current free image barely shows Maltzahn's face, and locating him isn't easy. --George Ho (talk) 03:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
- @George Ho: Do you feel strongly about the image? I believe that the current (free) image is sufficient. No need for the wiki pages to look like Luftwaffe propaganda spreads, compare with Der Adler, a wartime propaganda magazine of the Luftwaffe: link. However, if you disagree, I'd be happy to list it. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Yes because the image, even when it may produce a reaction, helps adequately identify this notable person, especially in a uniform. And no, the image doesn't make the whole article propagandistic, i.e. whitewashed, K.e.coffman. I disagree with the replacement. --George Ho (talk) 17:18, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- I reinserted the image. You may take it to FFD if you please. --George Ho (talk) 18:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Recent edit edit
Preserving here by proving this link [1]; pls see edit summary for rationale. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:24, 25 August 2017 (UTC)