Talk:French cruiser Pothuau
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Parsecboy in topic Ref for details of the launching attempts
French cruiser Pothuau has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 17, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Pothuau/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Will take this one. Parsecboy (talk) 17:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Initial comment:
- Some details are available here, here, here, and here. This has some details on French tests with a director system like Pollen's or Dreyer's, but is only partly viewable. This, though only a snippet view, mentions Pothuau being involved in the hunt for SMS Wolf. Parsecboy (talk) 17:42, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- I do seem to have a blind spot for Google Book searches, but all done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, and Ed could lecture us both about old newspaper archives. Parsecboy (talk) 14:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- I do seem to have a blind spot for Google Book searches, but all done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- What did the boilers burn?
- Towards the end of the 2nd para of the design section.
- It seems a little odd to jump around chronologically with the formal acceptance and Vicky's Diamond Jubilee
- Just trying to keep all the construction/completion stuff in one spot.
- Speaking of that, you might consider linking to Diamond Jubilee of Queen Victoria - it's a redirect to a section in her article, but it's probably more relevant than the generic diamond jubilee article.
- Good idea.
- "Contre-Amiral Caillard" - I'd suggest using the English for his rank, since that seems to be the preferred style in the article.
- Really? I used Contre-Amiral three times, compared to once for Counter Admiral. I have switched the order of the French term and the translation as I used the former more often than the latter.
- I meant more that it seemed that you give the English term first and then the French - not just for ranks, but for unit names and the like. Do it however you like, but it should be consistent (and "Contre-Amiral" should be italicized either way). Parsecboy (talk) 20:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Consistency is good, from what I hear tell.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- I meant more that it seemed that you give the English term first and then the French - not just for ranks, but for unit names and the like. Do it however you like, but it should be consistent (and "Contre-Amiral" should be italicized either way). Parsecboy (talk) 20:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Really? I used Contre-Amiral three times, compared to once for Counter Admiral. I have switched the order of the French term and the translation as I used the former more often than the latter.
- "Around May 1904 the ship was relieved as the flagship of the Mediterranean Fleet's Cruiser Squadron[10] and she was placed into reserve in mid-1905, Pothuau was recommissioned on 17 April 1906 to serve as a gunnery training ship[3] and became flagship of the combined gunnery school under Contre-Amiral Le Bris in 1910." - this is a bit of a run-on sentence. I'd split it after she was placed in reserve in 1905.
- Concur
- You might clarify that Kamerun was in Africa
- I wouldn't call Wolf a Q-ship - that's a Brit-specific term as far as I'm aware. Merchant raider is a better link
- "On 17 May she began an brief overhaul..." - you might specify the "she" is Pothuau. Parsecboy (talk) 14:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- All done, see how it works for you. Thanks for giving this a good going over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Looks good, happy to promote now. Parsecboy (talk) 14:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- All done, see how it works for you. Thanks for giving this a good going over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:55, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Ref for details of the launching attempts
editHere, on pages 30 and 31. There's also a (bad) photo of one of the attempts on the plate between those two pages. Parsecboy (talk) 00:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)