Talk:Freddie Lee Peterkin

Untitled

Please note that I have previously created this page and it has been deleted by administrator Lid however this article should never have been deleted at the artist is an artist of note and has been interviewed continuously in UK and USA media on television, radio and in the print press. I have left references to both interviews, reviews and radio playlist samples demonstrating that the artist has been broadcast in the UK and USA.(Bookworm122@gmail.com (talk) 08:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC))

Boldface

I've pruned out some excessive use of boldface in the article. Please see WP:MOSBOLD for the guidelines on using boldface, and alternatives to be used when emphasis is needed. Thanks! Arakunem^Talk 18:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Repost

This is an individual of note who is frequently broadcast on UK and USA radio and has been in the print press consistently since 2003. Please refer to the sources and references below.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bookworm122@gmail.com (talk • contribs)

I contest speedy deletion of Freddie Lee Peterkin article. Yes it had been previously deleted as I had not added the newspaper articles, radio broadcasts and references to TV interviews which in this existing article I have given references to The Stage Newspapers and Freddie Lee Peterkin has been and is being broadcast on UK regional BBC Radio stations.

Please also refer to Google searches for footage and recording of these national public interviews and broadcasts. I had also given electronic media links to radio program playlists and independent reviews featuring Freddie Lee's music from the album Beyond Comprehension. I can add further interviews/broadcasts if needed but please advise. This is a person of note with more media sources avaialble for reference than many other artists listed on Wikipedia who have never been deleted. I have adhered to the guidelines set out in Wiki.

"In general, the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. Electronic media may also be used. As a rule of thumb, the greater the degree of scrutiny involved in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the evidence and arguments of a particular work, the more reliable the source is". .(Bookworm122@gmail.com (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:36, 17 October 2009 (UTC).

• Note to reviewing admin: This article from thestage.co.uk asserts enough notability to pass A7. If the thestage.co.uk article was not in Freddie Lee Peterkin at the time of the AfD debate in September 2008, I ask that the reviewing admin decline the speedy deletion. From Google News Archive, I can see only the thestage.co.uk source and a passing mention in another source. Peterkin may not be notable enough to pass WP:BIO, so I would recommend an AfD to see if more sources could be found. Cunard (talk) 06:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

I have reviewed the article and I have declined the speedy deletion. The (considerably shorter) version deleted at AFD was poorly sourced to pages like myspace, while this one appears to have some independent sourcing. If someone still feels the page should be deleted, another AFD nomination is in order. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:39, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

I have added links to videos of national broadcasts on the BBC, Sky TV and other radio stations to add further evidence of the artist's notability. Please take a look and please advise.78.149.241.202 (talk) 14:08, 17 October 2009 (UTC)User:Bookworm122@gmail.com 15:06, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Unsourced Accusation

I have undone the removal of the described unsourced accusation as Freddie Lee Peterkin discusses this case of persons infringing his choreographed works in the Sky TV interview but chooses not to name them for which I have provided the link and also in his WMBM radio interview. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.193.202 (talk) 19:12, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Freddie Lee Peterkin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110611122615/http://www.thestage.co.uk/features/showpeople/feature.php/7665/freddie-lee-peterkin/ to http://www.thestage.co.uk/features/showpeople/feature.php/7665/freddie-lee-peterkin

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Delete this

This is not anyone of note 2600:1700:3990:CE0:6D7E:B970:491:9B4D (talk) 01:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)