Talk:Fleet Foxes

Latest comment: 9 months ago by 2603:9005:701:3099:992D:A313:44C2:648E in topic Gengre(s)

Speedy deletion edit

I don't think this is warranted. Yes, they are a new band, but they have had a lot of praise, including write ups in the UK's Guardian and a review of their forthcoming release, Sun Giant, on Pitchfork rating it at 8.7 (very high). Rogwan (talk) 17:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

If the upper part of the banner has now been removed, does that mean it won't be speedily deleted? I noticed that within an hour of creating the article, Chickenflicker had already added more weight to it. Rogwan (talk) 19:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Fleet Foxes have just had a rave review on BBC Radio 2's Radcliffe and Maconie show, so I expect fandom and therefore the entry to grow significantly. --Griffin147 (talk) 21:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Band Members edit

What instruments does each member play? I'd like to find out, and also to add it to the page.  PN57  03:43, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Taken from their record´s personell page.

Robin Pecknold [Lead vocals, guitar]
Skyler Skjelset Casey Wescott [Lead guitar]
Christian Wargo [??]
Josh Tillman joined the band after the album had been released and is now their current percussionist.
--Albin H-L (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Live review edit

Here is a recent live review if anyone would like to cite it or link to it. (Full disclosure: I am an editor at Crawdaddy!, where this was published. But, to abide with COI guidelines, I am not posting anything on the wikipage itself, just letting editors know about the source.) It Shows: Fleet FoxesThanks for your time
Asst. Editor, Crawdaddy! FenderRhodesScholar | Talk 18:44, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

All Songs Considered edit

Does the NPR program "All Songs Considered" which covered the band a number of times deserve a mention as part of its rise to prominence, a la Rolling Stone and the Guardian? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.29.176.118 (talk) 20:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Gengre(s) edit

The current gengre that appears on the page is "indie folk". Judging from what I have heard from the group so far: aren´t there some Baroque influences in their sound as well? And maybe that gengre is a sub-gengre to "Indie Folk"? I am not sure.--Albin H-L (talk) 21:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I am SO tired of people fiddling with the genre - to be blunt, who cares? - how can you pigeon-hole this band? Lets get some new info in the article, lets write about the 2nd album; sorry I don't have the time to do that anymore. Iangurteen (talk) 18:02, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I favor the term post-Prog which, in the light of songs like Cradling Mother, Cradling Woman, seems appropriate. 2603:9005:701:3099:992D:A313:44C2:648E (talk) 18:16, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Future plans in biography articles aren't a good idea edit

Future plans in biography articles aren't a good idea. To start off a paragraph, as with "Robin has revealed that in his next album he.. [doesn't want to sound] 'too poppy'.."-- that information and "future" release dates make it hard to keep articles updated. That "future" often is today, or even last year in the blink of an eye, and when talking about musicians expected record releases and how it will sound in advance, it creates work for everyone later. There are ways to word such info so it never sounds out of date. Please look at the "Second Album" section, and try re-wording it please. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 04:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deepwater Horizon edit

I'm fairly certain naming saying that they were going to name their album Deepwater Horizon was a joke, seeing as it was the oil rig involved in the BP oil spill. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisB616 (talkcontribs) 22:05, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

-In response to this, I have to say that the title "Deepwater Horizon" was still stated nonetheles, and should be displayed for people who want to know it.

Second album edit

Per WP:NALBUMS, "Generally, an album should not have an independent article until its title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label." So, since the separate article Fleet Foxes LP2 cannot yet meet that criterion (and can never meet that criterion with its current title), I suggest it be merged back into this article. (edit: before it's deleted!) -- Ken_g6 (factors | composites) 17:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Surely someone needs to make a summary of the main points in the article about the 2nd album and get them into this page? Iangurteen (talk) 13:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Charts edit

For someone who has time to put this info in, the 2nd album is charting all over the place, see here. Iangurteen (talk) 16:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fleet Foxes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fleet Foxes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fleet Foxes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fleet Foxes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Awesome member timeline graphic edit

I just wanted to acknowledge that the timeline under the member section is FANTASTIC, such a clear and visually-appealing way to show which members play which instruments at which time. It wasn't me who created it, I just want to thank whoever added it. Cheers! Kaodigua (talk) 21:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply