Talk:Feminist views on sexual orientation
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | Text and/or other creative content from Feminist views on sexual orientation was copied or moved into Biphobia with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 | The contents of the Feminist views on sexual orientation page were merged into Feminist views on sexuality on 6 October 2019 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Feminist views on sexual orientation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150821003341/http://sdrc.lib.uiowa.edu:80/iwa/findingaids/html/CommonLives.html to http://sdrc.lib.uiowa.edu/iwa/findingaids/html/CommonlIves.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Feminist views on sexual orientation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323092851/http://www.international.activism.uts.edu.au/conferences/rebick/discussion.html to http://www.international.activism.uts.edu.au/conferences/rebick/discussion.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Blatantly biased edit
Is anyone going to expand the views on male homosexuality section to include the well documented vitriolic homophobia in radical feminism, instead of trying to confirm a random claim that gay male pornography is harmful to women by citing a self hating gay man who was literally married to a radical feminist (trying to make it seem like "look gay men agree too so it's not homophobic!") and offering absolutely no type of criticism towards the claim by, maybe, an "average" gay male writer/activist if that's what is important to have in the section? What a bizzare and obviously agenda pushing thing to have on Wikipedia. --FollowTheSigns (talk) 09:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)