Talk:Farida Akhtar Babita

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. A more concrete and better researched request might have a better chance. Born2cycle (talk) 05:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)Reply



Move from Bobita to Babita? edit

BobitaBabita

  • Following a post at the article I checked Google books to compare the usage of Bobita v. Babita. The searches included Satyajit Ray, since that filmography seems the most notable. "Bobita" satyajit ray [1] - 2 Google book results; "Babita" satyajit ray [2] 70 Google book results. I posted a name change request at WP:Requested moves in the non-controversial section - if someone objects, pls reply here. Novickas (talk) 21:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Searching in Google books is a bad measure of the usage of the actress's name. A better way would be to check what the Bangladeshi news media (English language) uses to refer to her. Babita actress at Daily Star vs. Bobita actress at Daily Star. However, this pair of searches support your proposal that Babita is the more commonly used spelling. --Ragib (talk) 21:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • New name is more widely used in reliable sources - compare Google book results for "Bobita" satyajit ray (2) vs "Babita" satyajit ray (70). See article talk page for links to Bobita/Babita Gbook search results. There is a redirect to Babita already. Novickas (talk) 18:39, 28 September 2010 (UTC) Novickas (talk) 21:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • It seems that Babita is one actress and Bobita is another actress. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:57, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Hmm. The most accurate solution would be a disambiguation page for Babita, since it might be pretty hard to determine which is the primary topic. (Wikipedia:Disambiguation). But a disambig page would need to fix what looks like a couple hundred internal links. As a quicker solution, does anyone object to renaming this article Farida Akhter? She might actually have more of a presence as F.A. rather than as B. in reliable sources like books [3], scholarly articles [4], and U.S. university sites [5]. That would be in line with Wikipedia:Article titles, which asks us to check usage in reliable sources. With hatnote on both pages - 'This article is about Babita Kapoor, an Indian actress. For the Bangladeshi actress and social activist known as Babita or Bobita, see Farida Akhter', and vice-versa. Novickas (talk) 15:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
I strongly object to renaming it to Farida Akhtar. The actress is virtually never referred to by that name. None of her movie credits are by that name. **All** the links from your google searches point to a different person by that name. So, that is a completely unacceptable solution. I think the disambig page is the way to go. --Ragib (talk) 16:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Ok, withdrew that. But where do we go from here? I guess I'm OK with the current set-up - not motivated enough to fix all the links if a disambig is created. Novickas (talk) 14:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bobita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:35, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bobita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply