Talk:Elwood Richard Quesada

POV statement Such short-sighted

. . .should be removed. Will revisit in one week. Morenooso 18:02, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Is his full name correct here?

Regardless of whether Elwood Richard Quesada is his actual full name, it should be noted that a Time magazine cover story listed his full name as Elwood Ricardo Gonzalo Quesada. John Dhabolt (talk) 09:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elwood Richard Quesada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090912040952/http://www.af.mil/information/heritage/person.asp?dec=&pid=123006493 to http://www.af.mil/information/heritage/person.asp?dec=&pid=123006493

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Post Nominals

I'm wondering if it's appropriate to cite British Orders after his name, given that as an American military officer, while he could accept the orders, it would have been considered inappropriate and questionably legal for him to use them, himself, owing to a constitutional prohibition on titles of nobility. It's my understanding that institutions such as the Order of the Bath, while not exactly nobility, still are an extension of the British peerage system. Izuko (talk) 13:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)