Talk:El Cortez (San Diego)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


rating of article

edit

As a member of WP:NRHP and occasional rater of articles, i am torn about how to rate articles like this one. In terms of quantity and probably quality of info, it is Start or above. But it does not use in-line citations to support specific assertions. Note, the External Links in the article are probably more than that, they are probably actual sources. So reluctantly i think it is a stub for now. It could easily be a Start or B-class however. It would also improve the article to obtain the official Registraton/Nomination document for the site from the U.S. National Park Service, by request to nr_referenct (at) nps.gov. doncram (talk) 17:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on El Cortez (San Diego). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Reply