Talk:Demons and Wizards (Uriah Heep album)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors reviewed a version of this article for copy editing. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
Untitled edit
Ok... ok... this album came before the band Demons & Wizards and their self titled album, so why is their album's page 'Demons and Wizards (album)' when this is 'Demons and Wizards (Uriah Heep album)'??? I would think Uriah Heep is more popular than Demons and Wizards (the band) anyway...
Article name edit
Should be changed from "Demons & Wizards" --> "Demons and Wizards". As can be seen in the album cover, it is "and", not "&". Diamon 16:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Demons and Wizards.jpg edit
Image:Demons and Wizards.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
3 = 4??? edit
Wikipedia says: "Demons & Wizards was remastered and reissued in 1995 with three bonus tracks" but there are 4 tracks listed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.123.247.237 (talk) 04:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Requested move edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 07:50, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Demons and Wizards (album) → Demons and Wizards (Uriah Heep album) – There is other discussion going on at Village Pump about incomplete disambiguation in general, and "primary album" in particular, but in this case Demons and Wizards (Demons and Wizards album) is also mentioned in Larkin's Encyclopedia of Popular Music so encyclopedic notability of both albums and the need for for unambiguous disambiguation should be evident. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support disambiguation should not be ambiguous. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 04:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.