- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 02:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
David Leonard (record producer) → David Leonard – A dab with two items. Move this and use {{for}} ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:22, 9 February 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 21:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Weak support. It's a pretty bare-bones stub but pageview analysis suggests that people are mostly looking for the record producer. I don't think the dab page is necessary in this case. PC78 (talk) 08:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Oppose - this is a choice between two largely empty and unsourced article stubs. That the number of views to the DAB is high suggests that people may be looking for a subject for which we do not have an existing article at all. Top Google search results point to a country singer by that name (former member of All Sons & Daughters and Needtobreathe), which explains why some people landing on the DAB page might think that the record producer article is the same person (its not). This is a weird situation, and I see this as WP:NOPRIMARY until both articles are expanded (or deleted as unsourced) and the country singer is added to the DAB and perhaps a standalone article created for him. -- Netoholic @ 08:48, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Support. With the dab page being expanded this rm seems moot... but the record producer does get 92.9% of the pageviews, by my count. So I can't really oppose him being placed at David Leonard. Nohomersryan (talk) 02:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Its not really moot. As I said, there are two "David Leonard"s working in the music industry - both near Nashville. One we have a stub article for, the other we don't. The one we don't have an article for actually seems to rank higher in searches due to some recent album releases. Any page views for this stub are incredibly suspect. -- Netoholic @ 05:04, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Oppose per Netoholic. A one-sentence stub for a barely-notable individual is ill-positioned to claim primacy. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 04:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
- Oppose per Netoholic... In ictu oculi (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
