Talk:David Castro
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Anarchyte in topic Requested move 6 March 2019
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Requested move 6 March 2019
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Anarchyte (talk | work) 11:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
David Castro (actor) → David Castro – Because of no interest in David Castro (swimmer), but interest in this page. --Quiz shows 04:45, 6 March 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. samee converse 23:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 22:39, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose for now. The page views show that the disambiguation page is getting a lot of hits, which to me always suggests that we have a missing article. In this case, there are actually two actors named David Castro, and the other one shows up prominently in web searches, so that might be the culprit. Overall, the situation seems to unsure to put any article at primary. I suggest we figure out what topic people are going to the DAB looking for. -- Netoholic @ 13:56, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Of the two articles we have the actor is clearly primary with regards to usage. Looking at the page views graph linked above, hits for the dab page appear to spike at roughly the same time as the actor. This suggests to me that most people are looking for the actor's article so we shouldn't hinder them with an unnecessary dab page. PC78 (talk) 15:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. The young actor has insufficient notability for elevation to WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 18:57, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support. The actor appears to be the only topic of interest, so he meets both facets of the primary topic gudeline for this name. Nohomersryan (talk) 19:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support as the overwhelming WP:primary topic in a WP:TWODABS situation. 98% of all readers want the actor[1], and more importantly a maximum of only 13% of readers landing on the dab page want the swimmer[2] (and that assumes every viewer of the swimmer's article gets there through the dab page). Station1 (talk) 00:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support Per Station1 98% is a clear PT especially in a 2DABS situation. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:57, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support per Station1. Calidum 03:02, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.