Talk:Daemonologie

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Daemonologie article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Occult Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

"REASONS for PERSECUTING a WITCH".?! edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I am Stunned how Anyone who has (presumably) received a First-World Education in preparation for life in the second decade of the 21st Century, could characterize "Daemonologie" as a laudable text:

"It was a political yet theological statement to EDUCATE a MISINFORMED populace on the history, practices and implications of sorcery and the REASONS for PERSECUTING a WITCH in a "Christian society" under the rule of canonical law."

It's a SCOUNDREL's Errand to claim the desire to "...Educate a MIS-Informed populace on the..."Reasons for Persecuting a 'WITCH' in a 'CHRISTIAN' Society..."

When the majority of that "populace" has been MIS-Informed and Manipulated for Generations by Slanderous, Pejorative Judeo-Xtian MYTHOLOGIES about "Witches" at the direction of a Paranoid Monarchs & its Subservient Clergy, >90% of the Blame for that 'Misinformation' Lays SQUARELY with Theocratic Monarchists.

There are N E V E R Justifiable 'Reasons' to employ IRRATIONAL LIES to PERSECUTE Fictionalized Minorities. 172.250.69.244 (talk) 12:45, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

That sentence was introduced in May 2016 by User:Mysticalresearch, who seems to be inactive now.

You are right, that sentence is unacceptable. I replaced it by the pre-Mysticalresearch version. --Hob Gadling (talk) 12:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Oh right. Please don't shout. We can hear you well if you write normally. --Hob Gadling (talk) 12:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic