Year of description

edit

This species was described in Linnaeus' Systema Naturae (1758). I don't know why so many sources, including the IUCN, are saying 1766. Anyone know what's going on? Elspooky (talk) 11:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference #1 is marked as a dead link: however, it is not dead, and neither is its doi

edit

This is the first instance of a marked dead link that I've come across. It does not appear dead, but perhaps I'm missing something. What should be done?

CrazyBuilder (talk) 14:26, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply