Talk:Countess of Chester Hospital baby murders

Latest comment: 9 months ago by DeFacto in topic Excessive detail of trial

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reinstatement of WikiProject Crime banner edit

The WikiProject Crime banner was removed by an anonymous editor with the comment that "Not yet known if it is a crime". However, doing so deprived the Crime WikiProject of oversight of an article that is clearly crime-related. I have reinstated the WikiProject Crime banner because this article includes commentary that a person had been arrested and criminal charges had been laid. Clearly, the Police believe it is more probable than not that a crime has been committed and that they have enough evidence to hold a particular person to account for what happened. Whether or not this is proven at trial to be beyond reasonable doubt remains to be seen. The fact that an allegation of a crime has been made is sufficient for an article to be of interest to WikiProject Crime. WikiProject Crime is about improving the quality of crime-related articles, not just proven crimes. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 10:34, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Excessive detail of trial edit

Really seems far more than would be encyclopaedic, esp in this article. Springnuts (talk) 16:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Totally agree. I have tagged the section as undue; if other editors wish to condense the information, please go ahead. GnocchiFan (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Were you suggesting there might be a different article, in which the coverage would be justified? With 22 separate charges, the trial has had to cover a lot of ground. It's already taken over nine months. 205.239.40.3 (talk) 13:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Should we merge this with Lucy Letby? PatGallacher (talk) 13:52, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Seems like the best thing to do, as a lot of the information in the trial should be moved to there (was added before Lucy Letby has a wikipedia article). Now that she has one, it makes sense to move the information there. --87.114.4.172 (talk) 14:07, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support merge. It is pointless having two articles on the same subject. Dormskirk (talk) 14:36, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I have transferred some material on the initial investigation to the article on Lucy Letby. There is now no information in this article that is not in the Lucy Letby article. I propose that this article is replaced by a redirect to the Lucy Letby article. Dormskirk (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I disagree per my WP:1E comment below and per the merge discussion there. -- DeFacto (talk). 15:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I support the merge too, but this should be the main article per WP:1E. -- DeFacto (talk). 14:55, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I have merged the two articles. I am happy for the merged article to be moved here per WP:1E if others agree. Dormskirk (talk) 14:59, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Operation Hummingbird edit

The investigation is known as "Operation Hummingbird". Can this be mentioned in the article? 87.114.4.172 (talk) 14:07, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply