Talk:Commercial Felony Streaming Act

Untitled

Note: a search on Thomas (http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.php) revealed no such bill. 78.26 (talk) 03:08, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

• Isn't this it? - Eureka Lott 03:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Yup! Good catch. Wow, I'll keep my opinions in check, but wow. If this comes anywhere close to passing, it would certainly be notable! 78.26 (talk) 03:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Widespread ignorance and hysteria

Would it be worth noting in the article that the vast majority of those claiming to be "opposed" to S. 978 apparently do not understand that the law has NOTHING to do with existing types of copyright infringement that are not for "commercial gain or private advantage", i.e., "profit". Uploading for profit (paid for publication or reproduction, including electronic reproduction, without license) has been a criminal offense for many years. The bill would, however, criminalize public performance for profit, whether or not a new copy is made (i.e., streaming is not a "copy" - a defensive loophole). 18 USC s. 2319. Lupinelawyer (talk) 15:20, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

So what happens when a public performance results in unintended financial gain such as being signed on by a recording studio? Is that considered "receipt of anything of value"? 70.185.127.53 (talk) 20:57, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill S.978. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707051057/http://www.opencongress.org:80/bill/112-s978/text? to http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s978/text

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bill S.978. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150417074719/https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s978 to https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s978/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s978/text

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)