Talk:Christine Nelson

Latest comment: 2 years ago by ToQ100gou in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Christine Nelson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Try shrinking the lead to three paragraphs per MOS:LEADLENGTH.
  • Remove the comma after "first episode of Degrassi Junior High"
  • It's Late → "It's Late" (all uses)
  • That's about it here.

Concept and casting edit

  • Is the hyphen necessary between "provocatively-dressed"?
  • "Of the filming" doesn't sound right. Maybe change "Of" to "On" or "During".
    • All fixed - I've made it "Speaking of the filming". to make it more clear. ToQ100gou (talk) 03:26, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Characterization edit

  • "father may had" → "father may have"

Role in Degrassi edit

  • Except for the one in #The_Next_Generation, are the TV screenshots needed?
  • Remove the comma after "were a baby".
  • There's a word missing between "by parents".
  • "withhold a payment" → "withhold payment"
  • Is "day care" two words in British English?
  • "which Spike responds" → "to which Spike responds"
    • All fixed. I also just put "daycare" as one word. ToQ100gou (talk) 03:28, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Novelization edit

  • "based from" doesn't sound right.
  • Remove the comma after "support her daughter".

Reception and impact edit

  • "story line" → "storyline" (all uses)
  • "14 year-old" → "14-year-old"
  • Remove the comma after "pregnant in real life".
  • "for the Planned Parenthood" → "for Planned Parenthood"

References edit

  • The main sections #Episodes and #Sources do not seem necessary. I would merge them all here into subsections as:
==References==
===Citations===
===Episodes===
===Sources===
Done. I didn't think of making subsections! ToQ100gou (talk) 03:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·