This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Christina of Markyate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150703065251/http://www.ely.anglican.org/news_events/archived/900events/pdfs/Christina%20of%20Markyate.pdf to http://www.ely.anglican.org/news_events/archived/900events/pdfs/Christina%20of%20Markyate.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Anglo-Saxon
editAn editor changed "Anglo-Saxon" to "early English" in "came from a wealthy Anglo-Saxon family" on the ground that "we professional medievalists no longer use the racist term". Johnbod deleted "early" on the ground that early English is a strictly linguistic term. Some American historians regard "Anglo-Saxon" as racist because it is used in that sense by some American white nationalists, although the usage appears to be obscure as I have not come across it in the many articles I have read about racism among Trump supporters. The term is not regarded as racist in the UK and a leading British journal is called Anglo-Saxon England; it has American members of its editorial board. I do not think that American racists should be allowed to dictate whether a term is racist in UKEng usage and I will change the term back to Anglo-Saxon. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- I agree on the general point, but she was born "about 1096-1098" - ie 30 years after the Conquest, which is really too late to be calling people AS. Johnbod (talk) 18:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- The article did not say that she was AS, but "who came from a wealthy Anglo-Saxon family trying to accommodate with the Normans at that time", which I take to mean that she was a member of a wealthy Anglo-Saxon family before the Conquest adapting to the new regime. It seems a legitimate usage in that sense.
- I am also doubtful of the logic of stopping calling people Anglo-Saxon when their rulers changed. They did not suddenly change their identity at that point. Dudley Miles (talk) 19:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Well in those days her parents were probably born after the Conquest too. No, perhaps they did not change their identity, but we just stop calling them AS, using "English" instead. That's the usual convention. If not by 1096-98, then when? That's quite simple; when we stop calling people or things "Norman" is a more tricky question. The rest of the sentence makes it clear that an ethnic contrast is being made. Ask at the project if you like, or User:Ealdgyth. Johnbod (talk) 20:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)