Talk:Chris Webber

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Robbmonster in topic listed height

top five reasons

edit

The top five reasons why Chris Webber shouldn't be blamed for his time-out in the 1993 NCAA basketball final should be added.User:TMC1982

Hello, I beg to differ. As well-documented as this information is, it is barely considered encyclopedic. An encyclopedia contains facts, not analyses. Though much of what contained in the list can be largely, or perhaps overwhelmingly agreed upon, essentially it is analyses and deductions of established facts, and not the facts themselves. The only facet of this list that gives it any merit and thereby affords its mention in wikipedia is the fact it was featured on a television program, the articulation of which appears on this very website. Therefore, this list, should it deserve mention at all, should be contained within its relevant article - the article about the TV show it appeared on.

Having said that, I have at least provided a link to the reasons, which appear on List of The Top 5 Reasons You Can't Blame... reasons where it ideally should stay.

Downwards 07:55, 10 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

PoV being added

edit

Someone had sneaked in the following line after the section about the NCAA striking his achievements from their records:

"Given Webber lied about the events for years leading up to the trial, one would be hard pressed to believe anything that comes up out his mouth. His selfish actions brought great shame to the Unversity and relegated the basketball program to second tier status."

I've removed it, keep an eye out for its return!

The Timeout??

edit

Shouldn't there be some mention of the infamous time-out? The time-out is the only thing I like about Webber, and I don't think it would be POV to say "One of the most memorable blunders in sports history" or something like that.

It is mentioned in the College Career section. --SubSeven 15:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
No it isn't. I came here specifically for this information and it is nowhere to be found. What a useless puff piece of an article. 20:27, 24 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.188.183.6 (talk)

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Producer

edit

i think he's also a music producer.. he did a track on the "hip hop is dead" album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.68.170.208 (talk) 19:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yep, the Nas song "Blunt Ashes" as well as Nas song "Surviving the Game".--droptone (talk) 23:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Chris Webber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chris Webber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Webber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chris Webber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

listed height

edit

Most sources I have seen over my lifetime have listed Webber at either 6'10" (most common), or 6'11" (less common), but until today I have NEVER seen him listed at 6'9". Where did this height come from?Robbmonster (talk) 06:50, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply