Talk:Chris Brandon

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Maxim in topic GA Review
Good articleChris Brandon has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 27, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Chris Brandon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Very well done. I was concerned at first by the shortness of the Early life and Style sections, but I understand why they're short, and it's good to have at least a little on that part of the subject. As for images, I found this free image at Flickr. Except, I can't see the numbers, so if you could visually identify Brandon if he's on the field, you can crop it and that would be an OK image for the infobox. Maxim () 14:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply