Talk:Chelsea Pensioner

Ceremony Image from the home page

On the home page of Chelsea pensioner's is this ceremony image available, thought it could be added to the article, by giving credit to the Royal Hospital Chelsea. --xeryus (talk) 22:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

how many live there etc?

needs work - hopeless article doesn't give even the basics

Residential care?

It would 'tell the whole story' if it could be mentioned how far the care of Chelsea Hospital goes. I note that it is a requirement for in-pensioners to be capable of looking after themselves to be resident. What happens if the pensioner becomes incapable (commonly known as 'senile') and in need of residential/social care? Does the hospital provide within its walls or does the person have to go elsewhere?Cloptonson (talk) 19:11, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

=== It seems to be implied that there will be care later on; only when first resident must the Pensioner be capable of living independently. Varnebank (talk) 21:05, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 13 November 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain ^t/c 14:32, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

---

Chelsea pensioner → Chelsea Pensioner – They are called Chelsea Pensioners here in the UK which is the proper name. They are referred to as 'Chelsea Pensioners' across Wikipedia and throughout the article itself - everywhere except in the title. The name needs to be capitalised to be correct. The title should not be allowed to stand just because the article's starter made an error Jack1956 (talk) 23:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

• Quite correct. The article needs to be moved to Chelsea Pensioner. 86.171.159.202 (talk) 00:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
• Support clearly a proper noun. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
• Support per common name and proper casing. This actually could be a noncontroversial move (i.e., see the early 19th century painting Chelsea Pensioners reading the Waterloo Dispatch). Randy Kryn 21:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chelsea Pensioner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100918022849/http://www.chelsea-pensioners.co.uk/men-in-scarlet to http://www.chelsea-pensioners.co.uk/men-in-scarlet

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chelsea Pensioner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/2044282
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100901220035/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-sport/football/article-23824506-chelseas-blues-will-be-in-the-red-next-season.do to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard-sport/football/article-23824506-chelseas-blues-will-be-in-the-red-next-season.do

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:36, 30 November 2017 (UTC)