Talk:Charlotte Whitton

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Bearcat in topic LGBT categories

Untitled

edit

Since the person this article is about has been dead since 1975, would it not be normal usage to refer to her in the past tense? (as in 'Charlotte Whitton was..." rather than "is". Marty55 02:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Old Ottawa Flag.png

edit
 

Image:Old Ottawa Flag.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

lesbian

edit

Is there prove that Charlotte Whitton was a lesbian? Demophon (talk) 20:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Another ref

edit

Not sure this is considered RS: http://www.dailyxtra.com/toronto/charlotte-loved-margaret-57245, but its at the top of the google search Ottawahitech (talk) 14:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)please ping meReply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte Whitton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Charlotte Whitton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte Whitton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

LGBT categories

edit

I note that at some point in the past couple of years, this article was added to Category:Lesbian politicians and Category:20th-century LGBT people, so I'm leaving this note here to clarify that this is not appropriate.

While it certainly seems likely to modern eyes that her relationship with Margaret Grier was probably a lesbian one, the evidence for that is not conclusive and has remained a subject of unresolved debate. Boston marriages, for the record, were not always lesbian spousal relationships, and did sometimes take place between heterosexual or asexual women who just didn't have husbands for some other reason as well — it really was sometimes just a Kate & Allie "sharing a household to save money" sort of thing, rather than always being a lesbian couple — so the mere fact that Whitton and Grier lived in that kind of arrangement is not in and of itself definitive. Their letters have been debated, but there hasn't been any sort of consensus of scholars established one way or the other.

As well, regardless of whether they were a lesbian couple or not, Whitton certainly never came out as lesbian in a modern sense, so it simply isn't clearcut as to what her sexual orientation was or wasn't, as she simply never claimed any sexual orientation label in her own public words.

So for all of those reasons, there just aren't the grounds to categorize her as lesbian. And this isn't homophobia talking; I'm an openly gay man who actively tries to contribute to Wikipedia's coverage of LGBTQ topics, and the question of whether we can definitively prove that Charlotte Whitton was a lesbian or not has long been on my radar as something to look into. But the evidence simply isn't definitive enough to describe or categorize her as a lesbian: with the sources that exist at present, the only thing we can do is acknowledge and describe the debate, and it would be original research for us to treat her sexual orientation as a settled matter. Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply