Talk:Charles Busch

November 2011 comments

What do the critics say about Busch's work? Encyclopedia readers need independent analysis of his works in newspapers and magazines, not just what Busch says about himself. See WP:RS. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:58, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

In addition, please add the references that are missing in the article (where it says "citation needed"). Information that remains unreferenced must, unfortunately, be deleted. Please read these important policies: WP:V and WP:OR. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

January 2012

I started to add sources at each item as requested, but unfortunately will not be able to finish referencing until later, perhaps on or after Jan 12. Will also add some quotes, per request (assuming no one else does these.) Flami72 (talk) 13:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, Flami. This article had been part of a college class assignment in Autumn 2011. The students added material but not, unfortunately, many references. Thanks for supplying so many references, and I hope you will be able to get back to it. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Well, forgoing food, drink, and... I was able to reference most of the work as requested. I could not/will not have the time for digging out the hidden message requests. I may add a few more quotes later, I really am done until later this week. (And I just earned a B+ grade here, I think. Joke!!)Flami72 (talk) 20:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

We are grateful for your sacrifices! Happy New Year! -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:14, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Charles Busch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.allrovi.com/movies/movie/v347402
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130922213512/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/95021-Broadways-Ivey-Bergen-Halston-Punctuate-Charles-Busch-Movie-A-Very-Serious-Person to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/95021-Broadways-Ivey-Bergen-Halston-Punctuate-Charles-Busch-Movie-A-Very-Serious-Person
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130923052750/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/77133-Charles-Busch-Working-on-Book-of-Musical-Taboo-Due-in-Fall to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/77133-Charles-Busch-Working-on-Book-of-Musical-Taboo-Due-in-Fall
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130923004656/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/82765-All-Star-Auntie-Mame-Benefit-a-Sellout to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/82765-All-Star-Auntie-Mame-Benefit-a-Sellout
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130923025329/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/87019-Charles-Busch-Begins-Summer-Life-as-Auntie-Mame-on-June-28 to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/87019-Charles-Busch-Begins-Summer-Life-as-Auntie-Mame-on-June-28

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

"Close connection" template

The template claiming a major contributor has a close connection to the subject of the article was placed in 2017. I don't see any discussion or rationale on the talk page and nothing obvious leaps out from the article history. Can this template be removed, or if anyone knows a reason why not, please mention it here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.124.132 (talk) 04:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)