@Shirt58: I was wondering if you could point to which parts of the article rely too heavily on primary sources. There are 14 references most of which are independent of the event such as Le Figaro, Voici, Horse and Hound, fr:Public (magazine), British Showjumping fr:L'Éperon (magazine) Horse Actu, World of Showjumping and Mail online (I admit this one may not be useful for notability purposes). As far as I know none of these sources are affiliated to the event. The primary or affiliated sources are Equidia and the offical site of the event which I added for the purely technical parts such as the number of competitions prize money and the technical aspect of the arenas. Could you maybe let me know what needs to be added for this template to be removed. --Dom from Paris (talk) 12:19, 24 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
