Talk:Carlotta (performer)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Fair use rationale for Image:Carlotta in Number 96.jpg edit
Image:Carlotta in Number 96.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Disambiguation? edit
Should searching for just "Carlotta" lead to a disambiguation page? There are now three "You may have been looking for..." tags on this page. Is it time to disambiguate? -Lamarcus (talk) 00:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Done, see Carlotta (disambiguation). WWGB (talk) 11:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Requested move edit
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 03:29, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
– I'm not convinced that this person is the primary topic of all people with similar first name. Numbers for the fictional character is similar to this person. And this person's historical significance is nothing compared to... women of similar name with their own surnames and more prestigeous occupations, like acting and political royalty. George Ho (talk) 16:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support - too generic and not widely known enough to have rights on the namespace, NB shouldn't Category:Burlesque performers be added to the cats? In ictu oculi (talk) 01:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support replace with the disambiguatoin page -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 12:17, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
- Support. It's a very common name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.