Talk:Carl Gustaf Mannerheim (naturalist)

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Tiggerjay in topic Requested move

Untitled edit

Name of finnish coleopterist Carl Gustaf Mannerheim must be written without prefix von! Here in Finland (finnish Wikipedia) we have discussed lot of this question. There is official source: "Calendar of Nobility" [1] and Mannerheim familys's website also [2] you can check this point.

Now there is wrong redirect page so, that i can't move this article to right name! Carl Gustaf von Mannerheim -> Carl Gustaf Mannerheim (naturalist)

I try move it now, but if there is some problem, can anyone help me a little? --Gyllenhali (talk) 22:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I marked wrong RD-page Carl Gustaf Mannerheim (naturalist) with tag {{Speedy}}, but I can't wait no more. This article & discussion page must to be moved over it -> --Gyllenhali (talk) 23:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's now moved. Thank you for deleting RD-page! --Gyllenhali (talk) 23:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per consensus, and to revert undiscussed move Tiggerjay (talk) 04:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply


Carl Gustaf von MannerheimCarl Gustaf Mannerheim (naturalist) – Neither the official lists of Finnish or Swedish noble families include 'von Mannerheim' in their ranks, Finnish list and Swedish side & Swedish list while both contain clear reference to 'Mannerheim'. Regardless of the name used in publications Carl Gustaf Mannerheim is the name found from history books, for example in Finnish National Biography I'm not certain that the suggested name is the best possible option, but since for some reason page Carl Gustaf Mannerheim is already in use as disambiguation page it would seem to be quite reasonable option Wanderer602 (talk) 11:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment it seems like your RM was done back in 2008 and then recently in 2013 someone changed it to this without discussion on talk. I am going to put in a G#6 to revert it back. Tiggerjay (talk) 19:58, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.