Finland articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | ||
FL | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||
FM | 19 | 19 | |||||
A | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
GA | 4 | 8 | 20 | 48 | 80 | ||
B | 26 | 38 | 89 | 272 | 1 | 14 | 440 |
C | 21 | 105 | 223 | 1,049 | 331 | 1,729 | |
Start | 5 | 159 | 707 | 4,546 | 2,101 | 7,518 | |
Stub | 22 | 455 | 7,069 | 2 | 6,674 | 14,222 | |
List | 1 | 10 | 54 | 451 | 41 | 336 | 893 |
Draft | 33 | 94 | 127 | ||||
Category | 9,438 | 9,438 | |||||
Disambig | 346 | 346 | |||||
File | 69 | 69 | |||||
Portal | 55 | 55 | |||||
Project | 2 | 10 | 12 | ||||
Redirect | 1 | 2 | 5 | 134 | 760 | 902 | |
Template | 765 | 765 | |||||
NA | 1 | 10 | 6 | 17 | |||
Assessed | 60 | 347 | 1,558 | 13,617 | 11,606 | 9,456 | 36,644 |
Unassessed | 13 | 73 | 86 | ||||
Total | 60 | 347 | 1,558 | 13,630 | 11,606 | 9,529 | 36,730 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 131,320 | Ω = 5.47 |
Welcome to the Assessment Department of WikiProject Finland! This is where we focus on assessing and tracking the evolving quality of Wikipedia's Finland-related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the Wikipedia v1.0 Editorial Team, the article quality and importance ratings are also used within our project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying the topics most in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion by any editor wishing to take the time to make them, and are recorded through parameters in the {{WikiProject Finland}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate subcategories of Finland articles by quality and Finland articles by importance, which together represent the feedstock for our algorithmically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions
editIf you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion for it, please consider requesting a project member to reassess it.
- How can I get my article rated?
- You can request an article assessment at Wikipedia:Peer review, or you can ping any active member of the project and ask them to grade the article.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any editor or member of WikiProject Finland is free to add or change the rating of an article (per the criteria, of course) on their own, except for the FA, A or GA-Classes, which require a more independent and thorough peer review ending in formal consensus.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you should ask the person who assessed the article directly; they will usually be willing to provide you with more insight into their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can request a peer review or ping an active project member to weigh in using the links above.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions
editQuality assessment
editAn article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Finland}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Finland articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Finland articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Finland articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Finland articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Finland articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Finland articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Finland articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Finland articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Finland articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.
Quality scale
editClass | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Winter War |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of World Heritage Sites in Finland |
FM | Pictures that have attained featured picture status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. More detailed criteria
A featured picture:
|
The page contains a featured image, sound clip or other media-related content. | Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. | Hankopan.JPG |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Siege of Viborg (1710) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Jean Sibelius |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Helsinki |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Sipilä Cabinet |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Early 1990s depression in Finland |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Koli National Park |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | Finland at the 1952 Summer Olympics |
Category | Any category falls under this class. | Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. | Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. | Finland articles needing attention |
Disambig | Any disambiguation page falls under this class. | The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. | Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. | Mannerheim (disambiguation) |
File | Any page in the file namespace falls under this class. | The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content. | Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. | Independent Finland 90 years 5 euro Obverse.JPG |
Portal | Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class. | Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics. | Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date. | Finland portal selected panoramas |
Project | All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. | Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development. | Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project. | Index of Finland political party meta attributes |
Redirect | Any redirect falls under this class. | The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location. | Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. | Higher education in Finland |
Template | Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. | Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. | Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. | Finland in the Eurovision Song Contest |
NA | Any non-article page that fits no other classification. | The page contains no article content. | Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified. | IPA/Finnish |
??? | Article quality has not yet been assessed. | Articles for which a valid quality rating has not yet been provided are listed in this category. | A quality parameter should be assigned according to the assessment department of the WikiProject. | Wrede passage |
Importance assessment
editAn article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Finland}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Finland articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Finland articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Finland articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Finland articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Finland articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Finland articles) | ??? |
As with quality, after assessing an article's importance any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.
Importance scale
editImportance | Criteria | Example |
---|---|---|
Top | Core topics about Finland. Generally, these are sub-articles of the main Finland article that pertain to the nation, its people or culture as a whole, and are vital for understanding basic aspects of Finland or are extremely notable to non-Finns. This category should stay limited to approximately 100 articles. Biographies should be limited to the top one or two Finnish people in a particular field or persons of the greatest historical importance. | Finnish Civil War |
High | Topics that are very notable within Finland and well-known outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia. This de facto includes Finnish cities with populations larger than 100,000. | Paavo Nurmi |
Mid | Topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Finland, without necessarily being very notable internationally. This importance class should include urban areas with populations above 25,000, regional schools and universities and the second tiers of national organizations like Finnish football and Finnish ice hockey. | Henry (bishop of Finland) |
Low | The vast majority (> 90%) of pages will be placed here, at least until editing Wikipedia becomes far more popular and our membership swells so that we have enough capacity to shoulder the load. Remember this is English Wikipedia, not , and any subject without demonstrable international interest or affect lands here, full stop. Topics of mostly local interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic, as well as peripheral or trivial topics or topics that have only a limited connection to Finland, just to name a few. | Finnlines |
NA | Assessment grade when subject importance is not applicable; more generally applies to all non-article pages such as Redirects, Categories, Templates, etc. | 1809 in Finland |
??? | Subject importance has yet to be assessed. | Crimson Lotus |
Assessment log
editFinland articles: Index · Statistics · Log |
October 12, 2024
editRenamed
edit- Adéle Weman renamed to Adèle Weman.
Reassessed
edit- Elisenvaara (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Joanna Tynnilä (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Liinakhamari (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Myyrmanni bombing (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Adèle Weman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Otto Andersson (Finnish politician) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Category:Finnish prostitutes (talk) removed.
October 11, 2024
editRenamed
edit- Minister for European Affairs (Finland) renamed to Minister for European Affairs and Ownership Steering.
Reassessed
edit- Antonio Almen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Bad Piggies 2 (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Kai Meriluoto (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Matias Paavola (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Ria Öling (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Stumble Guys (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Tiia Peltonen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- University of Oulu Botanical Gardens (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Minister for European Affairs and Ownership Steering (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
October 10, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Antonio Almen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Elli Pikkujämsä (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Finnish Women's Cup (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
- Help:IPA/Finnish (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from High-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Lassi Nurmos (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Soldiers' Home Association (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
October 9, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Nickel deposits of Finland (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Tampere sub-region (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Category:Finnish syndicalists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Frans Grönlund (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Pertti Ylermi Lindgren (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Draft-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
October 8, 2024
editRenamed
edit- 1997 Rally Finland renamed to 1997 Rally Finland.
Reassessed
edit- Albert Edelfelt (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Johan Fredrik Aminoff (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Linda Nyman (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Category:Finnish film posters (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Okko Järvi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Pasteur's portrait by Edelfelt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- GeneRally (talk) removed.
- Template:Suomi-sarja teams (talk) removed.
October 7, 2024
editAssessed
edit- Otto Eloluoto (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Tiina Kautonen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Draft:Antti Marjanen (talk) removed.
- Category:Food ministers of Finland (talk) removed.
October 6, 2024
editReassessed
edit- Aarne Arvonen (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Finland-Paraguay relations (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- Finnish Meteorological Institute (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Solar Foods (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
edit- Aulanko (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Finnish women pop singers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Riku Jääskä (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- SILAM (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Vanajanlinna Manor (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
edit- Category:User fse (talk) removed.
- Category:User fse-1 (talk) removed.
- ^ For example, this image of the Battle of Normandy is grainy, but very few pictures of that event exist. However, where quite a number of pictures exist, for instance, the moon landing, FPC attempts to select the best of the ones produced.
- ^ An image has more encyclopedic value (often abbreviated to "EV" or "enc" in discussions) if it contributes strongly to a single article, rather than contributing weakly to many. Adding an image to numerous articles to gain EV is counterproductive and may antagonize both FPC reviewers and article editors.
- ^ While effects such as black and white, sepia, oversaturation, and abnormal angles may be visually pleasing, they often detract from the accurate depiction of the subject.