Work in progress edit

"First site" on NLL template links to Canonbury railway station#History which now says nothing about it but should shortly.--SilasW (talk) 20:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC) It does now.--SilasW (talk) 21:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Former services edit

Perhaps pretty boxes for "Former services" are useful where a track has been ripped out but so to list Former services just because what was the next station has closed strikes me as being over the top. On the NLL a multitude of services have come and gone. In any case when Mildmay Park station closed the NLR was dead and gone. There is also the error, common to former service boxes that between "Preceding station" and "Following station" there is a mendacious "Disused railways".--SilasW (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

traction edit

Mention might usefully be made of how both pairs of lines are electrified but by different systems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 19:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

It's not unique to this station - consider Queen's Park, Wembley Central, Harrow & Wealdstone, Bushey or Watford Junction, each of which have six tracks, four electrified at 25 kV AC overhead, the other two being 750 V DC third rail. What you need to do is to find a book or magazine which explicitly describes the electrification of this station, which can then be used as a reference per WP:V. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:31, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

"Canonbury tube station" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Canonbury tube station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 24 § Canonbury tube station until a consensus is reached. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:29, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply