Talk:Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Abductive (talk · contribs) on 12 July 2009 with the comment: A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability. It was seconded by Flaming (talk · contribs) on 2009-07-13 It was contested by Ceiriog (talk · contribs) on 2009-07-17 with the comment: Citations to reliable sources added to article |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article for deletion edit
This article has been marked for deletion. The reason given is "A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability". I have added references to this article. Many of these are in fact the same sources which the editor who proposed deletion found at Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting – news, books, scholar. As the editor who has proposed deletion has not discussed this on the discussion page, I am unsure whether his/her objection to the references that he/she found was that there were simply not enough of them or that the sources found were not reliable enough? Any article about an organisation in Madhya Pradesh is likely to have smaller number of web links on Google than a British or American organisation simply because the web is a less common way of communicating in rural India - I don't think you can decide on the notability of a topic purely based on the number of weblinks you can find to that topic. If Britain Yearly Meeting and Philadelphia Yearly Meeting are each notable enough to have Wikipedia articles, then why not Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting? To only have Wikipedia articles for British and American Yearly Meetings but not African and Asian ones solely on the basis that they do not have as many weblinks on Google will produce a very culturally skewed encyclopedia. If the editor who feels the topic is insufficiently notable would like to explain his/her decision on this discussion page maybe this could be discussed. As I have now added references to statements in this article, I will remove the article for deletion tag. Ceiriog (talk) 12:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090124222831/http://www.pym.org/pym_wgs/comments.php?id=2494_0_257_0_C to http://www.pym.org/pym_wgs/comments.php?id=2494_0_257_0_C
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090708124842/http://fwccworld.org/find_friends/index.php to http://www.fwccworld.org/find_friends/index.php#awps
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090708124848/http://fwccawps.org/find_friends/index.php to http://fwccawps.org/find_friends/index.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)